Texas National Guard Still Denying Marriage Benefits to Same-Sex Couples

Categories: Legal Battles

texasnationalguardwildfire.jpg
DVIDSHUB
If a same-sex marriage happens outside of Texas, but no law in Texas was there to recognize it, did the marriage ever even happen?

Earlier this year, a state senator asked Attorney General Greg Abbott to weigh in on the question in light of all the same-sex couples employed by municipal governments in Texas who have been getting benefits. Abbott's response: "The domestic partnerships about which you inquire are entirely a creation of the relevant political subdivisions." In other words, no.

Now, the Texas military is grappling with the same question, and is waiting for another ruling from Abbott.

Three months ago, gay and lesbian troops seemed to get a break from the Pentagon, when Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel ordered the National Guard to give federal marriage benefits to same-sex couples. Shortly after, Texas Major General John Nichols sent a letter to Abbott asking for some clarification about what to do, since people still can't get gay-married in Texas. "What actions, if any, can the TXMF [Texas Military Forces] take in order to fulfill the DoD policy of extending spousal and dependent benefits to same-sex spouses without violating the Texas Constitution and Texas state law?," Nichols wrote to Abbott, requesting a decision.

Abbott is still thinking about it, but Governor Rick Perry has made his feelings clear. In an email to Unfair Park, Perry's spokesman Josh Havens reasons that Texas military couples aren't entitled federal marriage benefits if they're not straight: "In 2005, the people of this state voted to define marriage in our state constitution as being a union between one man and one woman. Everyone in Texas, including state agencies like the Texas Military Forces, must live under to the laws of this state. "

Perry's stance is becoming a headache to military couples who may have moved or taken a trip to a state where gay marriage is recognized, expecting to bring the benefits back home with them. That's exactly what happened to Judith Chedville and Alicia Butler, who married each other in California in 2008.

Chedville is an Iraq war veteran who currently serves in the Texas Army National Guard. On September 3, the day Hagel's order was supposed to go in effect, she tried to get federal marriage benefits at Austin's Camp Mabry. The clerk at Camp Mabry reportedly took a look at Chedville's papers and said, "It's one of those." Stay classy, Camp Mabry.

Now Butler is being represented by the Dallas office of Lambda Legal, the LGBT rights group. Shortly after the failure at Camp Mabry, Lambda attorney Paul Castillo contacted Nichols to point out the obvious: The federal government wasn't asking the Texas military to perform same-sex marriages or to give gay couples special gay benefits. Also, the federal government funds the National Guard. "Our client did not ask you to identify and provide any state-specific benefits in Major General recognition of her marriage, only to comply with the military's policies -- a condition of the extensive federal funding you receive," Castillo wrote.

Meanwhile, the Pentagon is looking annoyed and says that states need to extend benefits to everyone. In an October speech he gave the Anti-Defamation League, Hagel said he was aware of "several states" that were refusing to process federal benefits for same-sex couples, and promised that the chief of the National Guard Bureau, General Frank Grass, would take "immediate action to remedy this situation."

But the situation still isn't remedied. In September, Abbott's office responded to the Texas military's request for clarification by procrastinating. More specifically, Abbott's office said he would need 180 days to make a decision. We can already guess what his decision might be.

My Voice Nation Help
15 comments
wrp136
wrp136

Have a slather of Texas logic; " Our state prohibits only same sex marriages and we are not in violation of the US Constitution. We prohibit dispensing National Guard benefits to same sex AND to straight couples at state-run facilities, because if we limited the prohibition to same sex couples, we would be violating the US Constitution....." 

ebailey75057
ebailey75057

Another lawsuit in development.  Another waste of Texas taxpayer's money over a ruling they are destined to lose.  Please move into the current century Texas lawmakers. 

Catbird
Catbird

Abbott will make a far better governor than Perry because he's a true conservative. Cheers!

JackJett
JackJett

It seems to me that it is of the utmost importance for G. Abbott to continually remind Texans of his homophobia.  It is HIS badge and he wears it with honor. 

I am grateful that Texans are far more current than he is. 

jmckee3
jmckee3

Federal law supersedes state law so there shouldn't be any question. Why is John Nichols asking a state official a legal question on a federal order?

Sharon_Moreanus
Sharon_Moreanus topcommenter

It's the National Guard not the Texas Guard.

Wasting time with his personal politics over something he can't do anything about.

ebailey75057
ebailey75057

Abbott is a tool of big business just like Perry is now

John1073
John1073

Straight men can be cross dressers. Don't assume homosexuals wear heels, you homophobe!

Sharon_Moreanus
Sharon_Moreanus topcommenter

Over 95% of day to day National Guard budgets are Federal. States only pay a small portion for facilities; and also pay for Guardsmen activated for a State-level emergency. All equipment, training fuel, ammunition, etc; all regular pay, is federal; obviously all mobilization costs are federal.

MaxNoDifference
MaxNoDifference

@Sharon_Moreanus But who writes the check or ultimately pays the charge? The state of Texas or the Federal Government?  That should determine if the benefits are payable.

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...