Texas Beats the National Average in Juvenile Detention Sex Abuse

kid in cell image.jpg
Image by Casey Serin
As the Texas Legislature's special session drones on, the state's lawmakers are grappling with what to do with teenagers -- specifically with 17-year-olds convicted of murder. Last Thursday the Senate approved mandatory life sentencing with parole for 17-year-olds convicted of capital murder -- with the option of parole coming 40 years into the sentence.

Previously, the possible sentences in Texas for any murder conviction for someone under 18 were the same as those for adults: a death sentence or a life sentence without parole. Then in 2005 the Supreme Court ruled that no one under 18 could receive the death penalty. Which brought the sentencing options in Texas down to one: life without parole. And then last year's Supreme Court decision in Miller v. Alabama also barred life sentences without the chance of parole for minors. Which brought Texas down to zero options.

And so Governor Rick Perry added this little problem to the special session agenda. The bill is currently in the House, and while they're figuring everything out there -- like whether or not having a single sentencing option really solves anything, as The Texas Tribune discusses -- the Department of Justice is looking at what happens to the juveniles once they're sentenced.

See also:
- Here Are the Graphic Novels Dallas County Will Use to Explain Prison Rape to Kids
- Keeping Teen Offenders in County-Run Lockups Would Save Cash. Not Everyone's Sure It's Wise.

This month the DOJ released the results of a national survey on sex abuse in juvenile detention facilities. Nationwide, according to the survey, 9.5 percent of juveniles in such facilities reported some kind of sex abuse over the last year. In Texas that number is more than 11 percent. The rate in state-run facilities nationally is nearly double that of private ones -- 8.2 percent versus 4.5 percent. Just under 8 percent reported that the incident involved facility staff while the remainder reported an incident involving other youths.

A spokesman for the Texas Juvenile Justice Department told the Texas Observer that the survey actually obscures the fact that Texas is improving. In fact, just a month ago a study for the TJJD ombudsman found that "youth do not report sexual assault to be a significant problem."

"We don't want to make light of the DOJ report," the spokesman told the Texas Observer, "but we know that kids over-report this kind of thing. We saw what some of the questions were when they were coming in, and we thought some of the kids might have a hard time understanding the questions."

Maybe there's a tendency to over-report, but the questions seem pretty (explicitly) straightforward:

During the past 12 months, have you rubbed another person's penis with your hand or has someone rubbed your penis with their hand?

During the past 12 months, have you put your mouth on someone's vagina?

During the past 12 months, have you put your fingers or something else inside someone else's rear end or has someone put their penis, finger, or something else inside your rear end?

Clearly this whole issue could be avoided if everyone just used Dallas County's anti-rape graphic novels.

Sponsor Content

My Voice Nation Help
holmantx topcommenter

Jun 25, 2012 Washington (CNN) -- The Supreme Court ruled Monday that two men convicted of killings committed when they were 14 cannot be sentenced to life in prison without at least the possibility of parole. Justice Elena Kagan said it would be wrong for states to ignore the chance that these now-adult inmates may someday be rehabilitated. "The mandatory sentencing schemes before us violate this principle of proportionality, and so violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment," Kagan said.  The high court in 2005 banned the death penalty for those under 18 who commit aggravated murder. Then, five years later, the justices said juveniles found guilty of non-homicides could not receive life without parole. 


A sticky wicket in deed. 

Justice Kagan does not recognize the loss of life . . . the innocent men, women and children (thousands in the aggregate) who some of these people will most certainly murder in the future.  For this she must bear some responsibility. 

How do we protect all the innocent people who will die in the future? 

A List of Murderers Released to Murder Again! - Wesley Lowe 

All I ask is that in your ZEAL to save the guilty minors who possess a propensity to murder again (and will do so no matter what you cook up), please also address how you intend to protect society from these murderers.

Now Trending

Dallas Concert Tickets

From the Vault