Wait, Why in the Hell Did Facebook Donate Thousands of Dollars to Ted Cruz?

Thumbnail image for cruzassaultrifle.jpeg
This dude: Facebook-approved.
It's pretty frequent these days to experience Impotent Facebook Rage (IFR), in which the social media giant does something so profoundly irritating or angry-making that you immediately vow to get off the site altogether. And yet, you don't cancel your account cold turkey (or at least I don't), probably because Facebook is basically a blue-and-white, pixelated version of crack cocaine. Today in IFR moments: According to campaign donation data from several sources, Facebook and its employees donated between $12,000 and $15,000 to Ted Cruz in the last election cycle.

Back in 2011, Facebook formed a PAC; a spokesperson told the Washington Post at the time that the body would "give our employees a way to make their voice heard in the political process by supporting candidates who share our goals of promoting the value of innovation to our economy while giving people the power to share and make the world more open and connected."

That's an amazingly wordy sentence that manages, at the same time, to say absolutely nothing at all. It's never been clear how the PAC chooses candidates to give money to; in 2012, Mashable found that they donate to Republicans at a slightly higher rate than Democrats (although, according to campaign donation tracker Open Secrets, they gave some $95,000 to President Obama's re-election, compared with just $20,000 to Mitt Romney).

More recently, Facebook's been in hot water with a number of liberal organizations over its new lobbying outfit, Fwd.us, which was ostensibly founded to support immigration reform. Now, it's facing a (largely symbolic) boycott from those liberal groups, including CREDO Mobile, MoveOn.org and the Daily Kos, over its support for senators who back the Keystone XL pipeline and oppose Obamacare.

So yes, Facebook giving money to conservative politicians and causes is nothing new. But really? Crazy old Ted "Harvard Is Crawling with Communists" Cruz? What gives?

According to Open Secrets, Facebook and its employees gave $15,000 to Cruz in the 2011-2012 election cycle, more than it gave to any other candidate or incumbent except Romney and Obama.

Spokesperson Jodi Seth disputes that all that money came from the Facebook PAC. "That dollar figure is inaccurate," she writes. "The Facebook PAC gave $3,500. There may have been additional contributions from individual employees. Also, the $3,500 was for last year and this year -- we don't normally give more than $2,500 to a candidate in one election cycle."

It's a little misleading to call the number "inaccurate." Open Secrets doesn't claim to separate out the Facebook PAC money versus donations from individual employees; also, the PAC is made up of Facebook employees. The money comes from the same place and goes to the same guy, only in one instance it makes a stop first at the PAC.

We also checked Facebook's filings with the Federal Election Commission. It shows, as Seth said, $3,500 total donated from Facebook's PAC to Cruz in the 2011-2012 cycle. One check was for $1,000, from September 2012, the other for $2,500, from that November. But the Influence Explorer, another very reliable campaign donation search site run by the Sunlight Foundation, clocks Cruz's total donations from individual Facebook employees at $12,500. That brings the total to $16,000, according to them, or $15,000 according to Open Secrets. The point is, either way, Facebook and its employees are giving a lot of dough to Uncle Ted.

And that's interesting, because Cruz has taken a host of, ahem, strong positions on various issues: The Gays, The Communists, The Illegals (in every case, he's not a fan). It's also interesting because, on the whole, individual Facebook donations lean heavily Democratic, an almost 70-30 split. So which of Cruz's pet issues, exactly, do Facebook employees as well as its PAC support so wholeheartedly?

The answer: We don't know. Seth declined to answer several questions about how Facebook chooses its donation recipients.

"Off-the-record, we do not get into the specifics of why we donate to individual candidates," she wrote. (A quick note on that: I informed Seth that I didn't consent to her comments being off the record. The whole purpose of press officers is to speak on the record. That's why we've included the quote here. Press officers, please cut that out.)

In other words, then, Facebook's PAC and its individual employees are apparently big fans of Ted Cruz, willing to throw serious cash behind the man, both through official company channels and private donations. They're just a little shy about saying exactly why. It's probably just his boyish good looks, right?


Advertisement

My Voice Nation Help
23 comments
Guesty
Guesty

I'd guess they did it because Cruz favors policies that will benefit a large corporation that prefers to keep its real business interests hidden in the shadows of its terms of use agreement and data harvesting efforts.  Cruz will be a solid opponent of any internet or privacy regulations that might hurt Facebook's business interest, which I would guess is the largest potential risk for Facebook for the foreseeable future. Just look at the bill Facebook spent the most time lobbying on in the 112TH Congress:  Commercial Privacy Bill of Rights Act of 2011 (A bill to establish a regulatory framework for the comprehensive protection of personal data for individuals under the aegis of the Federal Trade Commission).  I would assume that Cruz is viewed as a strong opponent of any government regulation of the internet or how businesses use personal information they gather.  

Facebook put its money where its money is.  Not at all a surprise.  The fact that Cruz is so offensive on almost every level means almost nothing to Facebook if he will protect Facebook from facing any responsibility for the way it uses/abuses/discloses personal information.     

ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul
ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul topcommenter

Anna, it is fairly common for the PACs associated with large companies to donate to both sides of the aisle.  As your own story noted the Facebook PAC donated 70/30 D/R.  Sometimes, the vote of someone that you don't particularly care for is needed.


keeponkeepinitdown
keeponkeepinitdown

Maybe because he doesn't want to tax every business into oblivion. 

mcdallas
mcdallas

$16k would be a big deal if it were for City of Cockrell Hill, Dog Catcher, District 4.  But for a US Senate Campaign, it's a blip.   $16k is chump change in political contribution world.  

animas
animas

Every conservative knows that Facebook is a tool of Satan  (put in place just to aggrevate Anna Merlan).  I will start worrying when they contribute to Kim Jong Un's campaign...

ScottsMerkin
ScottsMerkin topcommenter

A little reach around now for the big finish later?  This all relates to Sexual Anarchy right?

Chuck_Schick
Chuck_Schick

Because he helps fuel many a debate in comments fields?

pak152
pak152

@ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul yessirreee bob
if you look at the political donations found here you'll see that corporations tend to donate to both properties 60/40 split  65/35, 55/45. but don't look too closely at the union donations which tend to be overwhelmingly to the Dems 90/10 or 100/0

pak152
pak152

@everlastingphelps yes another slow newsday for the Observer. further proof that Wilonsky was carrying this blog

Anna_Merlan
Anna_Merlan

@mcdallas But it's not chump change for Facebook political donations. It's right at the top, below the presidential candidates. Is it his hair?? What's the deal here??  

bealotcoolerifyoudid
bealotcoolerifyoudid

@ScottsMerkin It relates but I think its Satan's opposition to Sexual Anarchy.  There is no doubt that Cruz is one of Lucifer's minions.  Likewise, it is obvious that Zuckerberg either 1) sold his soul to Satan or 2) is Satan- after all Facebook sucks up too much time and energy.

ScottsMerkin
ScottsMerkin topcommenter

@Anna_Merlan @mcdallas It has to be that they are warming up for a Cruz presidential run, thats why he is 1st after the presidential candidates

mcdallas
mcdallas

@Anna_Merlan @mcdallas I'd give $16k to get one of those pretty Texas stars with "Top Commenter" by my name.


primi_timpano
primi_timpano topcommenter

I thought Satan was a sponsor of sexual anarchy?

Montemalone
Montemalone topcommenter

@Mervis_Earl He'll be found in bed with a gay illegal immigrant (Canadian) reading Marx.

Mervis_Earl
Mervis_Earl

Question: Will he flame out sooner or later than Ooops did in 2012? I'm taking sooner.

bealotcoolerifyoudid
bealotcoolerifyoudid

@primi_timpano No Satan is really into having rules and being authoritarian and such.  Keeps his place filled with grammar Nazis and clean freaks.  And lawyers.  Lots and lots of lawyers (like Ted Cruz). 

However, Ragaraja has been linked to the Sexual Anarchy Agenda, but that is a different religion.

Now Trending

Dallas Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...