The Feds Forced Texas' Printable Gun Guys to Take Down Their Downloadable Blueprints

Categories: Guns

Thumbnail image for PrintableGunFiring.jpg
It wasn't quite heard around the world, but the shot fired by The Liberator, the plastic gun that University of Texas law student Cody Wilson designed and fabricated using a 3-D printer, was witnessed by a lot of people. It proved beyond a doubt that the gun works.

What people are still trying to figure out is what it means to be living in an age in which anyone can simply print a gun. Some have responded by penning doom-and-gloom opinion pieces and scrambling to ban the weapons. More people -- some 100,000 -- went to their computers and downloaded the design files Wilson had posted for free online through his company, Defense Distributed.

The Obama administration is not happy. Mother Jones reports today that Defense Distributed removed the file today at the request of the U.S. State Department. The letter to Wilson alleged that the company's file-sharing services violated the terms of the Arms Export Control Act.

Lawmakers obviously weren't thinking of manufacturing instructions for plastic handguns when they passed the law. Their focus was more on geopolitics and how best to control the flow of weapons to foreign governments and other actors overseas. But its use hasn't been limited to large-scale arms transactions. A college professor was sentenced to four years in prison in 2009 for sharing technical data on reducing drag on airplane wings and drones with foreign graduate students.

Wilson has decided not to test the government, not yet anyways. But he hints that the design will make it back online, just not anytime soon.

"I don't like it -- but I do think that it actually ends up helping the message of the project a little more, that, look, in the end we're going to be having a fight about what it means to be controlling information," he told Mother Jones.


Sponsor Content

My Voice Nation Help
6 comments
roo_ster
roo_ster

xdx is largely correct from  a common-sense POV.  When you can get an AK for $50 at a third world bazaar, a single-shot plastic pistol is not a player.

But, ITAR is not only in place to keep arms & arms tech out of the hands of Bad Guys overseas, it is also a barrier to entry to the industry and a club gov't uses to limit participation by the smallest folks in the industry.  Like one-man non-profits.  Kinda like requiring SarBox-level accounting before a charity can start distributing sandwiches to the poor.

xdarkridex
xdarkridex

Pretty sure they were outside their bounds on requiring them to remove those plans.  Constitutionally, this is no different than any other printed set of plans...and there are gun manuals that are effectively 'gun plans' all over the place in everyday bookshops.  Difference here is the manufacturing method, which is easier, but that's not the problem of the inventors here.

ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul
ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul topcommenter

Eric, if you read the Business Week article, it is pretty clear that Dr. Roth violated the terms of his research contract with the Air Force.


There are plenty of Americans who are more than qualified to do this kind of research.  It is just that the won't put up the BS in American graduate schools because they don't need a green card.

Now Trending

Dallas Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...