Despite Sharp Divisions, Dallas ISD Trustees Vote to Oppose Effort to Ease Testing Standards

ElizabethJonesDISD.jpg
Elizabeth Jones
Last night, the Dallas ISD Board of Trustees approved a resolution "opposing legislative efforts to diminish graduation standards and academic rigor." Basically, they don't like HB 5, the Texas House of Representatives-approved bill that would reduce the number of tests students take to graduate, and basically create separate college- and workforce-ready tracks. The bill is currently in the state Senate.

To be clear, the resolution doesn't really cause any action. Specifically it "calls on the Texas Legislature to amend House Bill 5 to ensure all students are enrolled by default in rigorous, college-ready graduation pathways, and the Trustees commit to adopting local policy that takes this stance should the Legislature fail to act."

Trustee Elizabeth Jones said she doesn't believe that non-college-bound students need less rigorous classes. Since DISD's goal is to help students live a meaningful and productive life, regardless of whether or not they attend college, students should not be put on less demanding tracks. This resolution is meant to be a reminder of that to Austin, she said.

(Update: Jones wrote to let us know she takes issue with this characterization. In an email she explains that the resolution is addressing "the idea that any workforce focused pathway should not be any less academically 'rigorous' (or 'vigorous' if you prefer) and must be maintained for academic robustness and should not waiver from the academic standards in a college-ready pathway." We've excerpted the bulk of her email below.)

"What are we expecting?" asked Trustee Bernadette Nutall. "What is our end game?"

See also:
Legislature's Step Backward on School Testing Makes Us Like France, Only Racist

Jones said that the point of the resolution is to make sure "4x4," the Texas Education Agency policy that all students should take four years of English, math, science and social studies, is not decimated. As college readiness and work force readiness are becoming the same thing, she said, all students need the same rigorous curriculum.

Trustee Nancy Bingham said she would not be supporting it, as did Trustee Carla Ranger. Ranger said she appreciates HB5 because it gives students flexibility to follow their interests. "I don't want a rigorous system," she said, "I want a vigorous system."

Trustee Mike Morath suggested tabling the resolution to adjust the wording, but Jones pushed for a vote. "Time is of the essence," she said, "the legislature is in session now."

The resolution passed 5-4, with Bingham, Nutall, Ranger and Trustee Adam Medrano voting against. Now it's just a matter of time to see whether or not Austin responds.

Update on April 29:

Dear Mr. Darby,

Your recent blog reporting of Thursday's DISD Board Resolution did not correctly report the facts, and also did not accurately and correctly portray the salient points.

I am responding to you in my individual capacity, and NOT in my official capacity as a Trustee.

Since your article names me personally, I ask that you please correct the inaccuracies reflected in your Blog article, also recognizing that your Blog article was the basis of a recent D Frontburner related blog post. I would hope that they also correct their inaccuracies as well, especially since they stated that you interviewed me, which you did not.

That said, as the main author of the Resolution, I'd like to make sure you understand the main point of the DISD Board Resolution. The Resolution's point to the Legislature is the ensuring of high academic standards. DISD supports HB5's creation of different pathways. If done properly with the highest academic standards (and the related funding), this approach will afford our children the opportunity and flexibility to custom design their own education. What was being addressed in the Resolution is the idea that any workforce focused pathway should not be any less academically "rigorous" (or "vigorous" if you prefer) and must be maintained for academic robustness and should not waiver from the academic standards in a college-ready pathway.

Specifically, it is imperative that high academic standards be maintained in math and science and the achievement levels and rigr are not diluted, especially given that the majority of 21st Century "skilled" labor jobs require these very learning foundations.

The title of your Blog references "Testing Standards". This is incorrect. The Resolution is specifically about raising Academic Standards for all secondary education academic pathways, whether college readiness or workforce readiness. The Resolution also states that the default pathway for our children should be the one that requires the highest academic standards and requirements, not the lowest.

Workforce readiness pathways are currently assumed in HB5 to equate to lowering academic rigor and performance requirements. In today's world (and the data and evidence clearly shows this) academic standards preparing children for college readiness are the same as for workforce readiness. That's the main point to the Legislature. We should be preparing our children for their success and should not be limiting their potential. How we structure and what the academic standards are secondary education pathways are therefore equally important, as are the assumptions used in the decision-making.

Please tell Jim Schutze hello, and that part of the development of the High Academic Standards Resolution was in part due to his recent commentary that I take to heart. He wrote that we should "teach kids that they must strive to break through every barrier and take their places not at the bottom, not at the middle but at the top of American society. Because that is the American way. It is not just a mistake and a waste of human potential to steer children toward lesser destinies. It's a sin and a betrayal of all that is truly American." I most certainly agree. The Board Resolution's point takes this one step further. We state that it would also be a mistake to lower academic standards for any secondary education academic path, especially if that path is tied to creating a legitimate 21st Century workforce readiness option.

DISD previously passed two Board Resolutions that may be of interest to you, one on High Stakes Testing and one on Vouchers. I encourage you to read both to understand our official position on those two issues...

It is especially important as a matter of proper governance to respect that once a Board action has been voted, the Board's stated position is a unified one, one that supports the action as voted. The Board President is the official spokesperson for the Board, and individual Board members should not be publicly criticizing after the official vote has been taken. All Board members sign the voted Resolution.

I hope that you will correct the record accordingly. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter.

With kind regards
Elizabeth Jones

My Voice Nation Help
7 comments
Cliffhanger
Cliffhanger

Those pathetic tests don't measure college readiness, they don't create college readiness and they don't improve basic academic skills. They just make money for Pearson and a bunch of consultants who leach money away from students, teachers and principals. Debating over college readiness and testing is like debating the theological importance of bicycles

bvckvs
bvckvs topcommenter

We tried allowing the church folks to exclude themselves from education, but it only prepared them for life as a priest, pedophile, beggar or burglar.

bbetzen
bbetzen

Dr. Blackburn's vote passed this resolution, but he should have recused himself due to conflict of interest. He is the Chief Business Officer for Dallas Can whose business is serving dropouts from DISD. By recommending that the default graduation plans in Texas be college readiness he is assuring an increase in dropouts for Texas Can. He should NOT have voted on this!

Testimony on this conflict was given before the vote (see minute 55 and following in the tape) along with a complaint to the Board on the conflict of interest of Dr. Blackburn, signed by 9 parents and tax payers. See background athttp://schoolarchiveproject.blogspot.com/2013/04/conflict-of-interest-on-dallas-isd-board.html

The conflict of interest statement signed 2-22-13 by Dr. Blackburn does not even list his employer who serves only DISD dropouts! See conflict statement: http://schoolarchiveproject.blogspot.com/2013/04/conflict-of-interest-on-dallas-isd-board.html.

DISD is in danger of graduation rates going back up due to tenured teachers and principals now leaving, and a high number of vacancies. It sounds like a plot by charter schools to increase their enrollment.

bbetzen
bbetzen

Beyond conflict of interest, the most delicate factor in this sad decision by the DISD Board involved our students. Many of our students struggle. For the large majority of them our schools are their first connection with an outside world, especially a world including literacy, numbers, and the mental discipline necessary to live in today's world. We must gently encourage and motivate them so that we do not loose them to less than positive attractions outside schools, or depression!

Motivation is the piece we are only now slowly beginning to make enough progress on. We have more work to do before we push “college readiness” as the default degree plan. Someday that will happen, but not until our real and true graduation rates, the percentages of all 9th graders graduating within 5 years, are comfortably above 90%.

We are only now achieving the 60% rate in Dallas! There are very real reasons the rest of Texas is working on a foundation degree plan that is not a college readiness plan. We need to listen. They are right! We should not pretend we are a North Dallas Prep-School, - yet! We are on our way though.

leftocenter
leftocenter

Every Texas student is not going to college.  Our testing environment has gotten so out-of-hand that the school day revolves around passing the lastest version of testing.  I understand the need for accountability.  But, college readiness and workforce readiness are not the same thing, nor should they be.

Let's talk about the greater good -- we need skilled labor.  Does a person need to be able to pass calculus to build superior cabinetry?  No. 

The divide between rich and poor is growing because those who aren't college bound -- for whatever reason -- are consigned to UN-skilled labor.  Our educational system needs a track for young men and women who, without a college degree, can earn a good living for themselves and contribute to our communities.  Our educational systems needs that every bit as much as it needs to prepare college bound students to pursue the hard sciences and the Arts. 

Everyone who wants to go to college should have that opportunity.  But, everyone doesn't HAVE to want to go to college to achieve some societal definition of success.  There is room for all of our skills and talents. 

RTGolden1
RTGolden1 topcommenter

In other words, DISD board voted to continue to feed the leeches on the body academic, represented by TFA, standardized testing corporations and charter companies.

DISDTeacher
DISDTeacher

@leftocenter Well said.  Because of the obsession with tests and pushing kids into physics and trig, many just drop out.  

The trustees know this and voted anyway.  THEY are making kids hate school, feel hopeless and drop out.  THEY are serving only the rich by ensuring that there will be many, many kids who can't compete because they don't even have a high school diploma.

The rich love this plan.  A parent literally said to me once, "All of this means less competition for my kid."

Now Trending

Dallas Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

Loading...