State Rep. Rafael Anchia Hopes to Repeal Texas' Gay Marriage Ban

Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Rafael_Anchia_NALEO.jpg
Rafael Anchia
In 2005, Texas voters considered adding an amendment to the state constitution declaring that marriage "shall consist only of the union of one man and one woman" and forbidding any formal recognition of same-sex unions ratified elsewhere.

The measure, controversial only insomuch as some conservatives feared that the language of the amendment -- that Texas "may not create or recognize any legal status identical or similar to marriage." -- would actually outlaw all marriage, passed easily, with 76 percent of the vote.

A gay Dallas couple who married in Massachusetts challenged the law as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Their attorneys are waiting to see if the U.S. Supreme Court will take up the case after a federal appeals court sided with the state.

In other words, the most likely way of lifting Texas' ban on gay marriage may be taking it back to voters. That's exactly what state Rep. Rafael Anchia, D-Dallas, plans to do.

Anchia, along with Garnet Coleman, D-Houston, filed a resolution yesterday calling for a vote to repeal the 2005 amendment. Specifically, they want to put the following somewhat convoluted language on the November 5 ballot for an up or down vote:

The constitutional amendment repealing the constitutional provision providing that marriage in this state consists only of the union of one man and one woman and prohibiting this state or a political subdivision of this state from creating or recognizing any legal status identical or similar to marriage.

In a statement yesterday, Anchia described the change as a matter of human decency.

"My constituents include many couples and families who are negatively impacted by the current constitutional restrictions," Anchia said. "It is time we revisit this issue; it is time we treat all Texans with dignity and respect."

And gay marriage supporters think the winds are now blowing in their favor.

"Texans now agree that all couples in loving and committed relationships deserve the opportunity to create stronger and more successful families," Equality Texas' Chuck Smith said. "Millions of Texans have had their own very personal evolution on this issue."

As proof, he cites a University of Texas/Texas Tribune poll indicating that more than two-thirds of voters support same-sex marriage or civil unions, with only a quarter opposed to either.

Convincing a hidebound Republican legislature to put it up for another vote is a different matter.


Advertisement

My Voice Nation Help
6 comments
MikeWestEast
MikeWestEast

Why would you think the Republicans would stand in the way of another vote? Do not believe that poll. I note someone inserted civil unions as a deflector. When the vote comes, it will be about marriage. The Republicans may even take control of it and do the vote at next legislative election to excite their base and boost their votes. The Republican base has not changed its mind and neither have the black churches. That 76 per cent was broad and deep. It was not one of those DISD turnouts where 5 per cent vote.

Salesmanpoet
Salesmanpoet

This is insanity: Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state." Keep up the good work: Rafael Anchia

John1073
John1073

It's going to take the federal government to step in to get rid of this awful amendment.

downtownworker
downtownworker

Thank you Rafael Anchia for standing up to these disgusting bigots.

Myrna.Minkoff-Katz
Myrna.Minkoff-Katz topcommenter

Republicans love to hate government interference in peoples' lives.. unless they don't.

MikeWestEast
MikeWestEast

@Myrna.Minkoff-Katz Having the state legislate any process on marriage is the real intrusion. Deciding what is a marriage s just part of the intrusive package. If you do not like intrusion let us get rid of the property transfer, tax benefits, social security, health and other legal benefits that accrue to state sanctioned marriage. Leave it up to the two persons involved on property and other allocations. Plenty of easy procedures used by persons in non-sanctioned arrangements. Then the issue disappears.

Now Trending

Dallas Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...