Texas Claims New Women's Health Program Will Serve More Patients Without Planned Parenthood, Despite Contrary Evidence

government so small.jpg
Sign from a War on Women rally at the State Capitol last year
On New Year's Eve, a state judge ruled that Texas can keep Planned Parenthood out of its new, state-run Women's Health Program. On January 1, that program began; it'll continue to be Planned Parenthood-less until at least January 11, when the next hearing in the case will be held, and possibly forever. And Texas health officials want you to know that despite the fact that Planned Parenthood clinics previously served more than half of all WHP clients under the old, mostly federally funded program, everything's going to be just fine. Somehow. State-affiliated researchers have found, miraculously, that non-Planned Parenthood providers will be able to take on thousands of new patients in 2013, something they learned without even talking to more than half of the providers.

Yesterday, the Health and Human Services Commission released this Provider Capacity Report, which was commissioned to verify that the state "continued to have the capacity to serve all of the women receiving benefits" from the WHP. It sent surveys by telephone, email or post to all non-Planned Parenthood, WHP-eligible clinics in the state, asking how many patients they served in 2012 and how many they'd be able to see in 2013. The results were exceedingly -- some might say disingenuously -- optimistic.

The HHSC claims in their analysis that Planned Parenthood previously served about 40 percent of the nearly 130,000 WHP clients statewide. (Actually, as this Texas Tribune interactive feature points out, independent studies have shown that the real number is anywhere from 45 percent to 80 percent of all WHP clients in some parts of the state.)

Under the new program, the HHSC survey says, the remaining providers estimate they'll be able to serve thousands more patients than they do currently, thus easily absorbing any former Planned Parenthood clients looking for a new home. Only San Angelo faces a "likely capacity deficit." In Dallas, for example, the non-Planned Parenthood clinics that the researchers spoke to served 10,202 patients in 2012 and estimate they'll be able to see 19,896 in 2013.

Impressively, the HHSC researchers managed to get these estimates even when the non-Planned Parenthood healthcare providers didn't respond to their survey. And most of them didn't -- overall, the HHSC's researchers only managed to reach about 44 percent of the providers in the state.

Nonetheless, the researchers provided especially generous estimates for the clinics they didn't talk to. In Dallas, for example, they estimate that the non-responding clinics served 934 people in 2012. In 2013, then, they conclude that they should easily be able to serve 20,830 this year. In San Antonio, the non-responding providers served 2,595 in 2012. So in 2013 they should obviously be able to see a whopping 36,977.

"In most areas," the report concludes, "the survey found that the state has the capacity to serve even more women in 2013."

It's not clear why the state is so confident that these remaining public health agencies can each take on hundreds or thousands more clients. Yet these claims from the HHSC were reprinted uncritically and without much analysis in numerous media outlets, including a widely reprinted AP story .

In response, Planned Parenthood released a statement pointing to a number of other independent studies that have found the exact opposite. In October 2012, for example, George Washington University's School of Public Health found that many large non-Planned Parenthood providers "are generally at, or close to, the limits of their capacity and will not be able to expand much, if at all, due to other resource or staffing constraints."

In December, The Dallas Morning News found that 222 providers in the Dallas area will be expected to serve around 13,000 women. But more than half those providers didn't see any WHP patients at all in 2011, raising questions about their preparedness to take over the excess patients. In an analysis of Austin-area providers, reporter Andrea Grimes found that many non-PP clinics had no idea they were part of the WHP and didn't in fact offer gynecological or family planning services.

The Austin-based Center for Public Policy Priorities said in September that it too has "serious concerns" about the new program. They point out, as we've mentioned before, that family planning funding overall has been cut by about two-thirds, leaving even less money for non-Planned Parenthood providers, who are at the same time being asked to serve thousands more patients. The CPPP also notes that 71 non-Planned Parenthood providers also didn't qualify for the new rules of the WHP, which required them to pinky-swear that they are not "abortion affiliates." That means they, too, are out of the program and unable to see WHP patients.

We could go on like this. Virtually every media outlet in the state and every public policy researcher who's even glanced at the issue for a moment has realized that without Planned Parenthood, the WHP is in serious trouble. Everyone, that is, except for the HHSC, which everywhere its researchers looked found only a "positive" and "robust" health-care network.

"This gives us great confidence that we can continue to provide women with family planning and preventive care and fully comply with state law," HHSC Commissioner Kyle Janek said in a statement yesterday. And apparently, confidence is all it takes.


Advertisement

My Voice Nation Help
6 comments
rbtxcat75
rbtxcat75

While I’m definitely not a big backer of Perry, I think this is a step in the right direction.Look, we pretend to be this enlightened society that has made so many strides but we are still doing something as barbaric as abortion.What we truly need included in the WHP are those organizations that want to treat the women and provide them with support and not try to fast track them to an abortion.Going to PP for guidance is like going to a casino for financial advice.Eventually, you are going to gamble in the casino.Same with the abortion in PP’s case (they contribute to a 1/3 of them in the US, accounting for the largest abortion house in the country.Their revenue from abortions is about 60% and they only refer their clients to an adoption agency less than 2% of the time).We need to get past the thinking that abortion is truly a “choice”.When in all actuality, it’s the only choice that is given by PP. We need to provide those in need (the mother’s) with true education and true choices.Not a life and death decision.

MisterMean
MisterMean

Texas is a joke and the people who are putting the signs on our backs that we are fools are our republican politicians.  Rick Perry is a fool and those who support him are idiots.


mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

Being an anesthesiologist by training, Kyle Janek is experienced in feeding people enough crap to make them forget reality. Apparently he is the perfect person for the job to roll out the facade Rick Perry et al want to hoist on the public.

ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul
ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul topcommenter

If you say it often enough and loud enough, it must be true (directed at HHSC and L'il Ricky).

Stendahl
Stendahl

Dr. Janek is evidentally unaware of the national news media projections of physician shortages particularly in distressed urban, and rural areas projected within the coming decade (and an actual reality in Massachusetts currently.)

Now Trending

Dallas Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...