Texas Finally Realizes Where Babies Come From, May Restore Family Planning Money

Thumbnail image for texas_women.jpg
Last legislative session, your lawmakers in the Texas Legislature cut $73.6 million from the state's family planning budget, a move which, impressively, has somehow resulted in far fewer patients being served, for more money per patient.

Don't ask us how they managed that one. As Emily Ramshaw writes this morning in the Texas Tribune , those same lawmakers are now realizing that less family planning money equals more babies, many of whom will be eligible for Medicaid. Which the state helps pay for. You see where this is going.

New figures from the Health and Human Services Commission indicate that in 2014 and 2015, poor women will deliver an estimated 23,760 more babies than they would have if they'd had access to affordable birth control. The cost of all those babies in state and federal funds is an estimated $273 million, most of which comes from the additional Medicaid costs.

Armed with that new information, Ramshaw writes, a coalition of lawmakers are discussing how to restore some of the family planning money as a cost-saving measure. In fact, they could have had that conversation last year, when they were first told about all these extra babies and how much they would cost.

As we wrote about in a cover story on family planning funding, the same lawmakers acting shocked and amazed at these totally unexpected babies were given more or less the exact same figures by the Legislative Budget Board last year.

Just one week after the new budget passed, the Texas Observer obtained a memo the LBB had previously sent to state lawmakers. It predicted that 284,000 low-income women would lose access to healthcare as a result of the cuts, with around 20,000 additional births being billed to Medicaid. That would cost the state $100 million over the next two years, and a total of $231 million in combined state and federal funds. Uncanny, how accurate that was, if a little on the low side.

If these same politicians are now actually paying attention to family planning, they might possibly be able to prevent the impending crisis that kicking Planned Parenthood out of the Women's Health Program is likely to cause. A very good analysis in the Dallas Morning News yesterday showed that in the Dallas area, there are simply not enough non-PP practitioners left in the program to serve all the patients who need a new healthcare provider.

Andrea Grimes did a similar analysis months ago for WHP providers in the Austin area , with the same terrible results. (Several of the doctors she called didn't actually provide family planning services at all, and had no idea why they were being listed as WHP providers. "If you want a colonoscopy, call us back!" one receptionist said cheerily.)

And of course, an article in the New England Journal of Medicine said more or less the same things, back in September : that the disappearance of family planning funding is dismantling the social safety net, with heavy costs to the state, the taxpayers, and most importantly, the health of poor women and families.

Even if the political will is now there, though, healthcare advocates have been warning since last year that it's going to be difficult to restore infrastructure and funding that's already in the process of being dismantled. So just remember this: when your lawmakers act shocked and surprised at the consequences of these cuts, they clearly haven't been paying attention. Or else they simply didn't care until those consequences hit them square in the budget.


Advertisement

My Voice Nation Help
12 comments
Socialworkrz
Socialworkrz

@WentRogue @fullfrontalfem This is great news. The decision to stop monies was political and they should be ashamed of themselves.

Rekeiji
Rekeiji

@pbagosy Holy shit have they finally realised that unwanted kids get turfed onto the state as well?

trillium13
trillium13

But but but Rick Perry said this wouldn't happen, that there would be more than enough coverage to go around! What a shock this is.

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

not really all that surprising, recall that these conservative republicans believe that a women can "shut her body down" when having sex to prevent becoming pregnant.

probably he first time that legislators screwing the low income citizens of texas is going to come back to haunt them.

the underlying problem to their idiocy is the lack of sex education in the schools. not only would our citizens have better knowledge about procreation (and how to avoid unintended babies), so too would these legislators.

maybe strauss could bring remedial classes into the next session...

albert.finney000
albert.finney000

I thought by the headline the article would be about Mexico.

ska0040
ska0040

Yay! Kill All The Babies!!

everlastingphelps
everlastingphelps topcommenter

Now, if only DC lawmaker could belatedly realize where money comes from, we might be able to get the economy back on its feet.

Chuck_Schick
Chuck_Schick

So they've finally learned that limited gubmint can't care for all those unborn babies after they're born?

Scruffygeist
Scruffygeist

Was it that, or did they realize in 18 years and 9 months those babies, based on their general demographics, are most likely to vote Democrat if they choose to vote?

pbagosy
pbagosy

@Rekeiji Give them some credit for taking only a year to figure that out.

Rekeiji
Rekeiji

@pbagosy A year after the initial cock up when common sense would have shot the idea down before the shortbus got home.

pbagosy
pbagosy

@Rekeiji Yeah, so pretty good for Texas.

Now Trending

Dallas Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...