Dallas City Hall Thinks 911 Lawsuit is Rubbish; Deanna Cook's Family Begs to Differ

Deanna Cook lawsuit press conference .jpg
Anna Merlan
The family of Deanna Cook at a September press conference announcing their lawsuit.
The sequence of events detailed in the lawsuit filed last month by the family of Deanna Cook was damning: Cook, screaming for help as her ex-husband attacked her, called 911. An understaffed emergency call center finally, after several minutes, dispatched officers, who stopped at a 7-Eleven and checked on a burglary alarm on their way. When they arrived at Cook's house, they knocked on the door and made a cursory check of the perimeter before departing, leaving Cook's body to be found by her family two days later.

Cook's story is no doubt tragic, but the city of Dallas has a story of its own, which it tells in a motion filed last week asking the court to dismiss the Cook lawsuit. It goes like this:

A 3-year-old Wisconson boy named Joshua DeShaney lived with his father, who beat him regularly and severely. Joshua's mother and doctors repeatedly alerted authorities to the abuse, but little was ever done to protect the child.

Eventually, when the boy was 4, Randy DeShaney delivered a particularly severe beating that left Joshua in a life-threatening coma. Emergency brain surgery revealed a history of traumatic head injuries and, while Joshua did not die, his brain damage was so severe that doctors predicted he would spend the rest of his life in an institution for the profoundly retarded.

The city brings this up because the Supreme Court famously ruled that the state did not have the responsibility to protect the child under the Constitution. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals found much the same thing in 2004 when it ruled in a lawsuit filed against the city of El Paso by the family of a woman and child murdered after a botched 911 response strikingly similar to Cook's.

In its motion, the city argues that the same principles apply here. One of the two claims made by Cook's family is that the poor 911 response unconstitutionally deprived Cook of her life. According to the city's filing, the DeShaney case proves that, however poor the response may have been, the city can't be held liable.

The other claim Cook's family makes in their complaint is that the city's poor response to Cook's call was the direct result of city customs and policies that discriminate against those who live in high-crime, minority neighborhoods. The city dismisses the argument as meritless and argues that, since the constitutional claims on which the lawsuit is based are "grossly unsupported" and have an "utter lack of factual support," the case should be dismissed.

The city isn't arguing the facts in the lawsuit, just that the lawsuit has no legal merit. Aubrey Pittman, the attorney for Cook's family, disagrees. In a filing today, he says its the city's claims that have no merit. That, of course, is for the judge to decide.

Sponsor Content

My Voice Nation Help

'The City that Works' is as cruel a joke as ever told - definition of 'the Big Lie'


When seconds count, the police are are only minutes (or hours or days) away.  I worked with a woman who was terrorized by a former boyfriend until he learned she went to a concealed handgun course and purchased a fire arm.  Universal answer for everyone? No, but I would rather have Deanna Cook alive and his relatives telling the media what a perfect saint he was up to the minute she splatter him that the current situation.

Sharon_Moreanus topcommenter

To bad they didn't care while she was alive.

ScottsMerkin topcommenter

Man this city is on a roll, we dont respond to car wrecks, thefts under $50 and if you beat the shit out of your wife, youve got 30 minutes and dont answer the door when we knock, we will just go away

TheCredibleHulk topcommenter

 @AdultBabies Yeah. Ridiculous to think that anyone else that lives in that community might be worried about poor 911 response times or slipshod performance by police officers.

Now Trending

Dallas Concert Tickets

From the Vault