Drilling Industry Reps Not Thrilled With Latest Dallas Task Force Recommendations

letter+writing.jpg
MasterPlan Consulting does not share this problem.
MasterPlan Consulting's Dallas Cothrum, the eyes and ears at Dallas City Hall for several energy companies interested in drilling in the city limits, is becoming quite prolific. Last week, we posted the gist of his letter to the drilling task force, which says that their recommended 1,000-foot set-back requirements from protected uses including residences and parks were "deal-killers."

Earlier this week, Cothrum distributed two more letters, and he's currently working on a third, due out early next week. The task force might as well buy binders ... or take up origami.

His January 17 letter says that the already agreed upon 1,000-foot setbacks mean, "You would be adopting a policy whereby it would be easier to have a sexually oriented business, a rock crushing location, a metal salvage yard, or many other uses than it would be to have a gas well."

At Tuesday's meeting, task force member Margaret Keliher, the former county judge, found the whole set-back conversation "uncomfortable" in that they were recommending restrictions on the drilling industry that are more severe than those placed on other industries.

This week's MasterPlan missives also address the drilling task force's thorough discussion defining set-back distances from drill sites to structures that are not classified as protected uses, which fall under the 1,000-foot set-back requirements. But if they're not protected uses, yet they house people for long periods of time throughout the day, what are they? Or how should they be classified?

That was the question that took up a significant portion of both of the last two meetings, delineating what constitutes a "habitable structure," what uses should qualify for protection and where to draw the line. The group zeroed in on setting a minimum distance to protect structures that have certificates of occupancy. Turns out, people can occupy lots of things.

A structure that requires a certificate of occupancy could be an office building, a landfill, a rock crushing facility, a parking lot, a strip club or a cell phone tower -- some, of course, are more commonly inhabited and consequently more worthy of protection, according to both Cothrum and several task force members.

Task force member Terry Welch took issue with the discrepancy in set-back distances for homes versus other places where people spend significant portions of the day. "I don't want to elevate just single-family residential," he said.

"I would rather have it 300 feet from a garbage pit than 1,000 feet from a house," task force member David Biegler said, adding that overly restrictive set-back distances can have the inadvertent effect of prohibiting a company from drilling in a location that is actually more conducive to the process.

After a somewhat divisive conversation, the task force ultimately voted 7-2 in favor of the 300-foot set back distance from a drill site to any structure with a certificate of occupancy. Like all of their recommendations, this will ultimately be approved or changed by city council.

Unfair Park caught up with Cothrum to see what he and his industry clients thought of the latest set-back recommendations.

"I would say we're disappointed," Cothrum says. By his calculations, only one of the dozen or so sites pending city zoning approval would meet the recommended requirements.

"The problem is that this has been a largely academic exercise that fails to meet the practicalities of land use in Dallas," he says of the task force process.

"If you cannot drill at North Lake, that seems crazy," he says, referencing the location where several drill sites are planned pending city approval, and one site is currently mired in the permitting process.

He says Luminant, which owns the North Lake land, has an electricity generating plant at the site that has a certificate of occupancy. "When you can't drill because of your own ownership," Cothrum says, it seems counter-intuitive.

The current recommendations would rule out drilling at other planned sites at Hensley Field and in Northwest Dallas as well. "I think they need to revise the set-backs based on the real world," Cothrum says. "I'd like to know where this is supposed to happen."

My Voice Nation Help
8 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Zac Trahan
Zac Trahan

The 300-foot setback proposed for places where people work, shop and eat is absolutely unacceptable. Do we really want to allow fracking 300 feet from a Chuck E Cheese? Or 300 feet from a mall? This is a non-starter. Also, allowing fracking within 300 feet of office bulidings would devastate our commercial real estate value, which in turn would reduce tax income for the city. The task force MUST revisit this issue before making its recommendations final.

Meanwhile, anything Cothrum says should be taken with a boulder of salt -- if it were up to him, fracking would be allowed within 300 feet of our homes, schools, hospitals and places of worship, as well as inside our city parks. He just isn't credible. 

furrpiece
furrpiece

There are new technologies for containing up to 80% of machine sounds.  There are also new methods for making drilling/fracking for underground minerals even safer.  I'm really surprised the task force and the city staff haven't reviewed these, and suggested their use.

Some are more expensive than others.  But, what's going on in the Middle East, and with an anti-American-petroleum administration in the White House, the value of drilling for our own energy here in Texas -- rather than importing it from the Middle East -- is extremely valuable.

dallasdrilling.wordpress.com
dallasdrilling.wordpress.com

Perhaps I should come over and pace off 1000 or even 750 feet from Cothrums door with a pedometer and then show it to him. I think he might change his cry baby routine at City Hall about this distance issue.

It needs to be 3000 feet from human beings, period. There is no data out there to guarantee any safe distance exposure via short term or long term effects.

In fact, I think not only his front door but other bigwigs as well. This is about to get interesting.....

Marianagriggs
Marianagriggs

Dallas,It's supposed to happen where people can feel safe about its location and the effects of the hazards associated with drilling.As for, "this has been a largely academic exercise that fails to meet the practicalities of land use in Dallas"- academics means science and if that is not practical then its probably also not safe. Keep up the good work, you are generating your own job and fighting for your cause to the end.MG

TXsharon
TXsharon

Aw, poor gas mafia. If they find the setbacks too restrictive and uncomfortable maybe they need to INNOVATE and develop ways to keep their product in the pipes instead of letting it leak out all over our neighborhoods. Maybe they need to INNOVATE to find safer drilling, fracking and production methods. Any industry that can INNOVATE and develop fracking can surely INNOVATE and find ways to handle the product after fracking.

Or maybe they would like to trade some setbacks for all those loopholes they enjoy in our federal environmental statutes that other industries don't have.  http://www.earthworksaction.or...

Or maybe they would like to stop with the MIPA overreach and trying to force landowners to pay the cost of drilling those wells. http://www.texassharon.com/201...

Some people have questionable comfort zones!

Guest
Guest

But, but, all my friends get to have businesses closer to people's houses! It's not fair!

She is right, though, that we haven't seen an in-depth study on strip club emissions and possible air and groundwater contamination, so I will be proposing that the city pay me $35,000 (preferably in one dollar bills) to do a detailed study on that very thing.

DoubleOJoe
DoubleOJoe

Do you need any subcontractors?  I'm skilled in root cause analysis and reporting.  I'm sure I could make a valuable contribution to your work.

Claytonauger
Claytonauger

Judge Keliher should know that a gas drilling rig or compressor station puts out a lot more toxic emissions than a store that sells dildos or beer. In fact, what the task force did was institute a two-tiered level of protection, one for houses, and a less protective one for the place you're forced to be at five or six days a week for eight hours or more. 300 feet is no protection next to a stack that releases tens of thousands of pounds of toxic chemicals.

Now Trending

Around The Web

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...