Yet Again, Love Field Concessions Proposals Deadline Extended Due to Many Questions
| The new Love Field lobby, post Modernization |
The reason? Well, as you'll see in addendum posted to the city's website earlier this week, vendors still have questions. Many questions. Thirteen pages' worth. Some are technical; others seek clarification, insisting the city's original RFP was too vague -- not the first time they've complained about that. And some want harder numbers from the city (several ask a variation on "Can the Airport provide a projection of enplanements for beyond 2015?" and it cannot). And some are plain grouchy, as in: "Why would anyone waste $15,000 - $20,000 to create a proposal, only to have it taken away by this 'lottery' need?" -- a query clearly posed by one of the upset incumbents not at all thrilled about the process. The going gets good 'round Page 8. Here's but one example:
33. There is no value at all for the pre-security location. Many other airports have tried this only to have them struggle or close. Would the City please remove this location from the assortment? If the traffic warrants a pre-security location, it can be developed after we know the exact EPAXs and traffic patterns.The phrase "the City disagrees" shows up quite a bit, matter of fact. Did this have to be this difficult? Love Field Concessions Addendum
Answer: The City disagrees completely with the statement that locations pre-security have no value. As a matter of fact, the current program at Dallas Love Field has offerings pre-security, and while not as successful as those post-security, they are profitable and provide a much needed amenity to the customers, employees, and those not ticketed.





















