When City Unveils Its New Districts, It's Hoping to Avoid Mess Facing State and Dallas County

Categories: City Hall
ruth-morgan.jpg
Ruth Morgan
In case you hadn't heard, the state and county redistricting processes have already gotten a tad ... heated, let's say, what with all the threats of lawsuits and the temper tantrums. The city of Dallas's Redistricting Commission is trying to avoid the same fate on the local level: Its members are hoping more "public involvement and transparency" will quell some of that (inevitable?) rancor before it arises, redistricting coordinator Peter Bratt tells Unfair Park. Also, the commission is giving itself a bit longer to redraw the city's districts, he says.

"With the state and the county, those processes had been happening in a lot shorter time period," he says. "This process is much more deliberate and much more open. Everything we've done has been put online and is being recorded."

The commission is hoping to wrap up its work by August 23, but its members -- among them such familiar names as Domingo Garcia, John Loza, Gary Griffith, Donna Halstead and Brooks Love -- will continue working into September if necessary, says commission chair and SMU professor emerita of political science Ruth Morgan, the expert on the subject. But she doesn't have any illusions that the process will be totally disagreement-free, she tells us this morning.

"I guess the nature of the product that needs to be produced generates considerable differences of opinion," she says with a kind of rueful little chuckle.

Morgan, who said back in early April she won't tolerate any shenanigans from the her committee, says she's "quite encouraged" so far. But optimism won't get the job done: "Realistically, one has to recognize there's a lot at stake in the way boundaries are drawn."

Dr. Morgan says there have been twice as many public hearings this time around than for the 2001 district redistricting process, largely because there was such widespread dissatisfaction with those boundaries.

"There were so many complaints" last time around, she says. "We're trying to get as much public input as we could this time, which does mean we have more to wade through. I think it's important the residents of the city feel they've had an opportunity and an investment in the process." At the most recent meeting of the commission, she says, more than 150 people testified.

And don't forget: You can submit your own plan through June 30. So far, around 25 people have told the commission they'll be submitting redistricting maps, and one over-achiever is planning on submitting three. Check the redistricting website for all the registration info.
My Voice Nation Help
3 comments
Cliff Dweller
Cliff Dweller

Domingo Garcia didn't even bother to attend the public hearing for his district.  Guess that "public input" thing only goes so far. . .

Brenda Marks
Brenda Marks

I guess I was blessed. He made the hearing for Districts 2 and 14.

Brenda Marks
Brenda Marks

I attended and gave testimony at a hearing last month and came away impressed with the committee members' questions and comments.  And I believe Dr. Morgan is a terrific choice as chair -- independent, very smart, consensus builder and does not suffer fools gladly.  They requested, and I submitted, written testimony after the fact with additional background information on my neighborhood --- Oaklawn (PD 193) -- and how it's evolved and will most likely continue to evolve in the next decade.  I think that type of information from all neighborhoods -- especially those now re-developing at a fast clip -- is important to consider when drafting districts and their asking for it gave me a glimmer of hope.

I just hope that the process is something other than an incumbent protection program -- and I think Madam Chair is just the person to made that happen.

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...