Kunkle Steps Out on a Limb, Calling for Transparency on the Trinity

Categories: Get Off My Lawn

SHZ_GetOffMyLawn_TitleImageV2.jpg
As you saw here yesterday, Dallas mayoral candidate David Kunkle has made releasing financial data on the Trinity River Project a plank in his platform -- well, a stick, anyway -- in part in response to stories he has seen here about it.

Kunkle is making ethics a theme in his run-off campaign. The need for transparency on the Trinity project is an element in that theme.

The Dallas Observer requested months ago that the city release emails and detailed financial information for the project. Rather than release the information, the city appealed to the Texas Attorney General, asking for an opinion allowing the city to keep at least some of the information we requested secret.

The Attorney General's Office eventually ruled that the information was public -- that it belongs to the public, not City Hall -- and told the city to release it. The city then went to court to sue the attorney general and ask that the opinion be overturned.

The amount of money involved floats around all over the map, but the city concedes it has spent at least $240 million on the project so far, even though barely a shovel of dirt has been turned.

I spoke to Kunkle, the former Dallas police chief, shortly before he made a public announcement of his call for the city to release the data. He called me. I'm sure I was on a list. Kunkle is methodical and doesn't do things like this without running his traps first.

He was basically saying that if I knew of an obvious reason -- a good reason -- why the city was sitting on this information, he would appreciate my fessing up. I bet he asked them the same thing.

It's a fair question. The city sometimes does have fair reasons for keeping its mouth shut, especially where real estate transactions or litigation might be concerned. I'm sure he was calling around to get the lay of the land. His style is to think first, then make calls, then aim, then shoot.

kunkle cropped.jpg
David Kunkle: for the first time in...in...ever, a copper is on our side.
I'm different. I like to shoot first, because then I have something to think about.

But I told him I honestly could think of no good reason for the city to sit so hard on this information other than fear of embarrassment. The city -- and I mean the hired staff and the elected representatives as well -- has gone to great lengths to give the impression that all of the zany fancy gewgaw elements of this project have been paid for by zany fancy private persons from the Park Cities.

That's extremely unlikely. The gewgaw tariff on the so-called signature bridges alone is in the hundreds of millions. What is more likely is that a whole bunch of that $240 million has been shifted and Fast-Eddied around to pay for zaniness, and the city is afraid of getting caught. And I bet a ton of that money has been wasted on the design for the toll road that will never be built.

Wasted, rat-holed, down the toi-toi and off to sea never to be seen again. That's what they don't want us to know.

The city's determination not to release the information we are seeking only makes sense as c.y.a. It was very heartening -- and I might even say exciting -- to hear a candidate for mayor say as much.

This whole business of the city suing to overturn a public-records opinion should ring a certain bell for you: It's what Mayor Dwaine Caraway did when the attorney general told the city to release information about a police investigation of a fight he had with his wife about his apron collection (sorry, never fully explained) at his house. He went to court too. And lost.

This is the same exact scenario, but this time it's about hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer money. Or, as I could say, it's about purse strings, not apron strings.

This is gut-level stuff. I can promise you, if the money wasn't pouring into Mike Rawlings's campaign fast enough already, it will start to flow like Niagara now. There is nothing the Citizens Council types care about half as much as protecting the Trinity River project from public criticism and scrutiny. They're going to come after Kunkle hot and heavy for this.

It's a strong move by Kunkle. But the blow-back will strong too.

My Voice Nation Help
13 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Tom L (No, Not That L)
Tom L (No, Not That L)

"I bet a ton of that money has been wasted on the design for the toll road that will never be built." And that's the best case scenario for the city. Worst case? They haven't spent a single dime on the design for the toll road because they've known all along it will never be built and the money has simply disappeared and nobody admits to knowing where it went.

Whodunit
Whodunit

Where is the City's famous "independent" auditor when needed? Oh, that's right, auditing the Katy Trail sign program contract to make sure everything was done accordng to Hoyle. 

Juan Valdez
Juan Valdez

Has Rawlings been contacted about this issue? Why define his position on this issue? Instead of having a good guy and a bad guy, why not put both on the spot and see who helps the cause the most.

Whodunit
Whodunit

If Rawlings does anything, it will be done with a wink-wink, nod-nod, after lots of coaching from the Dallas Citizens Council.  

Rainmaker
Rainmaker

Mike Rawlings will lose this campaign if he does not publicly support the release of this data. Voters are already wary of another sock puppet mayor who will drive our city deeper in debt like Leppert.

Someday someone will write a good article that proves the 1998 Trinity Bond Election primary purpose was to grease the wheels of construction and real estate.

Thank you politicians, DMN and D Magazine for selling this sham.

Casper
Casper

"Mike Rawlings will lose this campaign..."

I think you need to take your chrystal ball in for service.

Wylie H.
Wylie H.

And the Dallas Morning News will never devote a single column-inch to this matter.  For all their readers know--- this issue doesn't exist.

ScottsMerkin
ScottsMerkin

Kunkle went out on a branch and it just snapped.  Unfortunately for him and the everyday citizens of Dallas, the uber wealthy will make sure Rawlins wins and make it as hard as possible for people to see what they did with your money!  

Storm_71
Storm_71

 That is a damn shame Mr. Merkin. I am so glad I live in the great city of Arlington. Say what you will about the city of bits but the they have there shit wired pretty tight.

Guest
Guest

Great city of Arlington? What a joke. Arlington is a the biggest dump in DFW.  

ScottsMerkin
ScottsMerkin

please explain why the city of arlington is the biggest dump in DFW?

yeahIsaidthat
yeahIsaidthat

Trinity River Committee is headed by Dave Neumann. If you don't see a smoking gun in that statement alone, I don't know why. I would ask that the DO continue it's pursuit of this information much like the Dallas News did on Caraway's incident. Why aren't they do the same for this? Hmmmmmmmm???But you are right about the Citizen's Council going after Kunkle-it will be like a Christian, pin stripped, Cadillac driving mob hit on him.Wonder who the mob boss would be? LOL!

My guess is that you won't see nothing until after the new mayor takes over and Dave Neumann is gone. That's when it all hits the fan.

Whodunit
Whodunit

Of course.........the City can't possibly believe they have a valid legal position to withold this information from the public. This is pure delaying tactic and the Attorney General should be going after Dallas for breakng the law. They know they will have to give it up, but they want to get past the runoff election to ensure a victory for the DCC (ugggghhhhh, sorry, Rawlings). Then, they'll find a convenient scapegoat to blame all of it on (like Neumann). Like a bunch of criminals, plotting and scheming.  

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...