Police, Fire Associations Want to Know If City's Using Super Bowl to Violate Meet and Confer

Categories: City Hall, Crime
DPD_Badge2.jpg
I was looking for something completely unrelated on the Dallas County Civil District Court website this afternoon when I came across the petition you'll find after the jump, which was filed one week ago today. In it, attorney Haakon Donnelly -- on behalf of, among others, the Dallas Police Association, the Dallas Fraternal order of Police Lodge 588 and the Dallas Black Firefighters Association -- alleges that the city, in assigning on-duty officers to officially sanctioned Super Bowl events, may be violating terms of a deal struck with law-enforcement officials referred to as the Meet & Confer Agreement.

The petitioners demand to take the depositions of Dallas Police Chief David Brown and Dallas Fire Chief Eddie Burns "for the purpose of ascertaining the propriety of filing litigation against the City of Dallas."

By way of background, perhaps you recall: Faced with that $131-million budget shortfall last year, City Manager Mary Suhm asked police officers and firefighters to take a 2 percent cut in pay. In exchange, city officials offered (among other things) to rewrite the Special Events Ordinance to require the hiring of only Dallas Police Department and Dallas Fire Rescue officers should those holding special-events permits need law enforcement.

Per the DPD's Super Bowl XLV Operational Overview given to the city council's Public Safety Committee Tuesday, there will be some 44 NFL-sanctioned events citywide, on top of "at least eighty-six unsanctioned and thirty-one private known events occurring in Dallas," for which officers will be needed. Says the briefing:
Police & Fire personnel resources will be assigned to key venues for duration of operational period ... Other Police Resources will be assigned to maintain the capability of immediate response to incidents ... [and there will be] limited assignment of Police personnel to regional command posts or liaison positions.
Donnelly says most of those tasks would -- or should -- qualify as special events that would involve the use of off-duty personnel, who would be paid overtime.

"What we understand is on-duty officers are being rescheduled from on-duty assignments to provide security for events, like those at the Anatole," he says. "This would normally be a special event." He also says officers are being shuffled from their regular duties to Super Bowl duties. "And when we take officers from their normal on-duty assignments," he says, "they are now not able to do their normal work, which means someone else has to do their work or it doesn't get done."

Adds the petition: "The City is rescheduling officers to work as 'on-duty' personnel for these events, thereby reducing the number of officers normally and rightfully intended to work for the safety and benefit of the public good and taxpaying citizens of the City of Dallas. In doing so, and ignoring its agreement with the Petitioners, the City is effectively utilizing taxpayer funds to subsidize security for these private events."

Rank-and-file officers to whom I spoke today say, yes, there has been much teeth-gnashing and hand-wringing over Super Bowl duties. And Deputy Chief Charles Cato, who defers specific questions about the petition to the City Attorney's Office or city managers, acknowledges that he and other higher-ups in the department have been "trying to work some issues" with officers. Still, he says, "I don't believe the public's being put at risk. It's a job, and we need to get it done."

Messages were left today for City Manager Mary Suhm and Assistant City Manager Ryan Evans; I've also reached out to City Attorney Tom Perkins for comment. Donnelly says he's filed an open records request with the city for further information about DPD and DFR duties during the Super Bowl. The docs were due today, he says, but so far have not been received. Updates forthcoming.Rule 202 petition
My Voice Nation Help
9 comments
Zcockfield
Zcockfield

Why are the persons hosting the events not responsible for the security???! With all the money accrued from the special events surely they have enough money to pay off duty officers for the additional hours on duty. Im truly lost!! Come on Dallas?

Neimanmarcusred
Neimanmarcusred

You lay down with dogs, you get up with fleas. Serves the city manager right for the years of favoritism she's shown the people in uniform at the expense of civilian city employees!

Wylie H.
Wylie H.

How is the City NOT putting citizens at risk if it pulls dozens off regular duty to work Super Bowl special events? Why doesn't the Super Bowl organizing committee have to pay for these services? How much is the amount of these effective subsidies worth, and when did City Council authorize them?

Oak Cliff Townie
Oak Cliff Townie

If that happens There go Mega TONS of EXTRA JOB CASH that is about to Vanish into plain old time and a Half..

Oak Cliff Townie
Oak Cliff Townie

Yes they are And they will pay the city hefty Premium rates for the privilege to have it.

If you have seen some of the Public event ticket prices you will see that 1 or 2 VIP packages will Cover security for the evening.

Supply and demand The city might bill them by the Tens of thousands for a particular the event or $100.00 per officer and Squad car for by the hour.

The scheduled officers get regular time maybe time and a half .he City can pocket the difference .Then charge the regular time and over time to the Texas events trust fund and get that cash back as well.

I bet the only part of the Meet and Confer will be that the only public safety folks allowed will be sworn Dallas Police and Fire EMS. And guess who controls that ?

Kind of odd considering the city Water or Sewer plants hire Low cost rent a cops the city pays to keep those assets safe .

cp
cp

And that's exactly why they are complaining. The City has NO RIGHT to regulate their ability to work extra jobs off-duty. They make $40, $50 an hour on those off-duty jobs, sometimes more.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Why wouldn't the city have the right to regulate outside jobs? Everyone tells the government to act more like a business and this is incredibly common in private employment contracts.

Oak Cliff Townie
Oak Cliff Townie

Yes as a Matter of FACT they have every right to as they please After all they own the Logo on the uniform the Two ways And the squad cars and computers used on some extra jobs..Which in this case will all be needed by the on duty over time personal Sorry got nothing for the EXTRA JOB FOLKS at this time .

More important they have the Ability to Grant or Refuse permission to work at any location they chose .Which might not be forth coming because PUBLIC SAFETY ISSUES due to the lack of the lack of spare equipment to to so.

I guess Police and Fire will slower to endorse the idea or be on the Podium the next to a Host Committee bringing an event to our fair city when they understand all it will be is time and a half and not the High dollar windfall they hoped for..

Coming or Going those trade groups lose.. At least this time because it is what it is and changing it at this late date would surly endanger public safety

Now Trending

Dallas Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...