In City Hall Corruption Trial, the Question Is: Where Does Politics End and Bribery Begin?
I know, I know. It's a question that makes white people's blood boil. Former Mayor Laura Miller reported on her campaign finance reports all of her contributions five years ago from affordable housing developer Brian Potashnik, and nobody has ever adduced an ounce of evidence to show any tit ... or any tat, for that matter. The defendants in this case are on trial for something that seems a lot different, at least in the way the law treats it.
The feds have accused them not of getting campaign contributions and then being nice to contributors (what is called, in some circles, "politics") but of divvying up lucrative construction contracts in exchange for city council and plan commission votes (what is called, in most circles, "bribery"). But that's just how the law treats it. Doesn't mean the jury will.
And, one must say, some of the timing of the Potashniks' most generous contributions to the former mayor's campaign accounts does seem a bit, ahem .. untidy. She gets 10 grand from them one day before voting in favor of their project, five grand a short time after voting for another one. And she does vigorously oppose the projects of another developer, Bill Fisher, who is the main state's evidence guy in this trial.
Caveat: Everybody else voted for Potashnik too, and Miller thought Fisher was a slimeball because he gave a sitting city council member, James Fantroy, a contract to provide rent-a-cops at his projects.
But anyway, it all depends how the jurors see all this. Is the Miller thing an unfair diversion or a fair point to make? Tell you this much: The defense lawyers in this case are good. Ray Jackson handled himself well this afternoon, from what I saw.
And here's a breakdown on the jurors: 30-something attractive fashionista, black; 40-something nicely dressed church-looking lady, black; blond nurse-lady-type, serious, white, late 30s; two 40-something heavy-set black guys in a row, both in starched open-collar shirts, short haircuts, very attentive; 60-something white guy in glasses, open-collar, looks outdoorsy for some reason; 50-something white business lady in suit; 40-something guy, too far away for detailed character assessment; 30-something black woman in white suit, hoop earrings, very short hair; 50-something Hispanic female in black jacket over floral dress; 20-something Hispanic female gray sweater over pleated blouse; 50-something guy in gray Madras shirt, look sort of old Lakewood; heavy-set white guy, late 30s, glasses, office shirt, looks like a lawyer; 50-something woman of indeterminate ethnicity, could be from Michigan Upper Peninsula, Italy or Waco originally; white guy, 40s, burr haircut, works out; 30-something Hispanic woman who looks to me like she's worried about what her husband's doing with their kids.
They seem to be watching and listening closely. I thought Lakewood Larry was taking a snooze, but I wormed around, got a better look and saw that he was taking notes and squinting. I say the odds are even right now. Even Steven.
24 comment(s) / Post a Comment
Hey Jim
If you think it's "Even Steven," that can't be good for the prosecution. The defense hasn't even put on its case yet.
Posted On: Monday, Jul. 13 2009 @ 7:51PMwhat makes my black boil is when journalists don't tell all sides of the story. i think it is legitimate for blacks to ask why a Mayor of a city was not investigated? voters are not dumb,they believe that politics is inherently corrupted FOR,BY, and in the interest OF the wealthy,but they fail to realize that accountabilty remains their responsibility.
The media's contribution is educating the public of how government works. Miller's finance report told more than you report here. You argue here that there is no evidence of a quid pro quo with Miller. Four years later and there is still no direct evidence with Hill. I have no problem with Don Hill being held accountable, but black people still deserve an explanation as to why Laura was not investigated. It looks REAL ugly for Hill It looks ugly for Laura. All of the council members who supported Fischer's project look corrupt me.The voters should ask why. But only the black ones are having to make account before a federal grand jury. and Laura avoided answering to the public by not running for re-election but that doesn't make her innocent.
I don't know Jim. You seem to be really wrestling with the idea that Laura Miller took campaign contributions that were in check form, on the table for all to see. Let me help you start sensing the sharp distinctions in how Laura Miller operated with Potashnik and how the defendants operated. Read this old story about cash-stuffed envelopes delivered in an Exxon parking lot, wiretapped deals where quid pro quo is not just hinted at but overtly demanded, video taped council sessions where Mayor Pro Tem Don Hill claims to be stalling a yes vote on grounds of neighborhood opposition that never existed...and so forth. I really wonder about you if you can't see the distinctions here:
Mayor Pro-Tem Don Hill allegedly involved in pay for play bribe scheme
By Todd Bensman and Robert Riggs
2005
CBS-11 News
A Dallas lawyer and two local contractors claimed to be working closely with Mayor Pro-Tem Don Hill this Spring when a developer paid them a $50,000 down payment on a deal in which Hill would stop stalling a south Dallas project and get it approved, say two independent sources familiar with covert tape recordings of the negotiations.
Dallas attorney John Jerome Lewis, a longtime professional acquaintance of Hill, also an attorney, is heard on the FBI audio tapes negotiating the financial terms to clear Hill's political obstruction of the development, the two sources told CBS-11 News.
Working with Lewis was Grand Prairie cement contractor and former NFL football player Kevin Dean, and Desoto contractor Ron Ferguson, the two sources said. The trio is heard in tape-recorded telephone conversations from at least April through May of this year working out the payment of a $250,000 total cash sum, along with other highly lucrative financial benefits from developer Bill Fisher.
In exchange for Fisher's compensation to them, the men were to have Mayor Pro-Tem Hill stop blocking a zoning ordinance for the commercial project, the two sources familiar with the FBI-monitored recordings said.
The mens' references to Hill indicated that Hill was maintaining an arms-length but ever-present oversight of their negotiations with Fisher.
In October 2004, Hill killed tax credits for Fisher's Dallas West Villas affordable housing project in his Pleasant Grove district, then delayed a revived version of the development for nearly six months.
The mayor pro-tem finally moved to approve the zoning on May 11, the same day that Fisher paid Lewis $50,000 of the $250,000 and delivered signed agreements for ownership stakes and contracts worth far more, CBS-11 has learned.
Later, Lewis met Dean in the parking lot of an Exxon gas station and handed him an envelope.
Unbeknownst to any of his negotiating partners, Fisher had long been working as a confidential FBI informant recording conversations and meetings while the zoning languished, and the $50,000 he paid the men for Hill to move on the Dallas West Villas project was FBI sting money.
Through an email from a City Hall aide, Hill declined to comment for this story.
The Mayor pro-tem is not heard on any of the tapes described to CBS-11 News, although the FBI posesses many others that have not been described.
It remains unknown whether any of the money Fisher paid or promised ever reached the elected council leader, or whether Hill believed he would be compensated at the time he finally voted - all circumstances that certainly would interest federal prosecutors.
Hill and his plan commission appointee, D'Angelo Lee, are widely regarded as a persons of interest in an ongoing FBI bribery and extortion investigation related to an affordable housing boom in southern Dallas County.
Fisher has repeatedly declined to comment about his role in the FBI investigation. Attorneys for Ron Ferguson and Kevin Dean declined to comment on this story. Mike Snipes, a former federal prosecutor who is now a private criminal defense attorney, represents Lewis.
Snipes, who is familiar with the recordings that have been described to CBS-11, said the FBI tapes involving his client "sound incredibly damaging" but that they are "being taken out of context."
Snipes said Lewis' share of the $25,000 share of the money was a legitimate fee for legal and political work, not a bribe.
"My client John Lewis is innocent," Snipes said. "He never bribed anybody, never intended to bribe anybody.
"They were paid $50,000 as part of the transaction, the real estate transaction and as part of my client's legal fees," Snipes said. "That's absolutely consistent with legal practice here in this town. You need real estate lawyers for that."
DOING MAYOR PRO-TEM HILL'S BIDDING?
Although it remains unknown whether Hill directed the negotiations for his own financial benefit, CBS-11's two sources say Lewis, Dean and Ferguson are heard repeatedly describing – mainly in recorded telephone calls with Fisher - recent communications they claimed to have had with Hill throughout the talks.
For instance, at one point during the recorded negotiations, just days before a scheduled April 13 vote on the project, Fisher demanded that Lewis go back to the mayor pro-tem and find out how much money he wanted.
"I can't agree until I know what Don wants. I need to know what Don's number is," the two sources said they heard Fisher tell Lewis.
Lewis returned a short time later with the answer, ostensibly from Hill: $125,000 to be delivered before the next day's vote and $125,000 immediately after, the two sources say. When he claimed he couldn't come up with $125,000 on such short notice, Fisher was warned the project could die at the council table if the money wasn't paid and if agreements for other financial concessions weren't signed before the vote, the two sources said.
Hill had the vote postponed for the May 11 meeting, and FBI-monitored negotiations resumed.
After more recorded haggling, the deal on Fisher's project was concluded just in time for the May 11 council meeting.
A $50,000 CHECK CHANGES HANDS IN A GAS STATION PARKING LOT AS THE COUNCIL VOTES
CBS-11 has learned that on that day, shortly before Hill was to move for a vote, an FBI surveillance team photographed Lewis driving into an Exxon gas station parking lot. FBI photos described to CBS-11 show Lewis walking over to a parked pickup truck occupied by Dean and Ferguson. Lewis handed Dean an envelope containing what one knowledgable source tells CBS-11 was the $50,000 check from Fisher and signed agreements for an ownership stake in the project. Whether the envelope contained the check could not be independently verified, but it is known that Lewis and Dean split the $50,000 at some point.
Snipes, the attorney for Lewis, said any contractual documents the FBI has seized support his client's contention that he believed the agreements were perfectly legal.
"If it's FBI sting money, my client certainly didn't know that," Snipes said. "He thought it was payment from Bill Fisher for a legitimate transaction. You are right, it was split. But that's absolutely consistent with what they intended to do, which was to build developments in South Dallas."
CBS-11 News reviewed one unsigned draft agreement between Fisher and Dean's company KDAT that was crafted during this time - under the auspices of Fisher's FBI handlers as part of the bureau's criminal sting.
Dated April 11, the draft contract spelled out that Dean would receive upfront money "to cover direct costs incurred," a 10-percent ownership stake of the development's general partnership and revenues, and future construction contracts at pending Fisher developments around the state. In return, Dean's main obligation was to deliver "the support of Councilmember Don Hill to insure our site is zoned and approved…"
The draft document also stipulated that "Nothing in the agreements shall be effective unless or until the zoning case on Dallas West Villas becomes an ordinance…"
While Lewis was handing the money and agreements to Dean and Ferguson at the Exxon station on the morning of May 11, the Dallas City Council was in session with Hill at the horseshoe.
Fisher's ordinance came up for a vote shortly after 3 p.m. Hill asked Mayor Laura Miller to delay the vote for a short while so he could "kind of work on this item." He stood up and left the council horseshoe table, a video of the meeting shows. It was unclear where he went or what he did, but Hill was back at the horseshoe an hour or so later when the ordinance came up again.
He quickly moved to approve it this time.
Lewis was by then present at the council meeting, having traveled from the Exxon station meeting at some point during the day, possibly still monitored by the FBI surveillance team that had followed him earlier.
THE TROUBLED PATH TO APPROVAL FOR DALLAS WEST VILLAS
The May 11 transaction had its roots in a move by Mayor Pro-Tem Hill seven months earlier to kill Fisher's Dallas West Villas development at the corner of Bruton and St. Augustine roads.
CBS-11 has learned through records and interviews Dean, Ferguson and other individuals claiming political connections to Hill zealously initiated new negotiations with Fisher to revive the project shortly after Hill killed it.
The Dallas Plan and Zoning Commission, spearheaded by Hill's appointee, D'Angelo Lee, approved a new zoning ordinance for a renewed project on Dec. 16, records show. Commissioner Lee made a point to make sure that the zoning would contain a provision for liquor to be sold in the development.
The measure was sent to the Dallas City Council for approval where it inexplicably languished.
A long series of postponements orchestrated by Hill then ensued at the council level, closely corresponding to dates of behind-the-scenes negotiations and meetings that were occurring between Fisher and individuals claiming they could get Hill to revive the project.
For instance, Hill had the zoning measure postponed at the February 9 council meeting and again on February 23, citing neighborhood opposition. One opponent, Jerry Tolbert, appeared at the hearing to speak while three spoke in favor.
The zoning case came up again on March 9. Although no one appeared at the hearing to oppose the measure, and city staff recommended it be approved, Hill had the measure postponed again, saying he was still working to assuage local opponents.
CBS-11 has reported that at about this time, in February or March of 2005, an FBI-wired Fisher accompanied Ferguson and Dean to the offices of black Dallas business icon Comer Cottrell. At the recorded meeting, Cottrell was asked to pass on a large bribe to Mayor Pro-Tem Hill to get the zoning ordinance moved to approval, Cottrell confirmed.
Cottrell says he declined to do so.
In early April, Dean, Ferguson and Lewis did finally meet with the mayor pro-tem. They gave him a detailed presentation on a project, according to Venita Benitez, who at the time believed she would be cut in on the development.
The zoning ordinance was next set for a public hearing on April 13. In the days before this hearing, the FBI began recording an increasing number of phone calls and meetings negotiating the terms required for the delivery of Hill's support.
It was in one taped call the night before the April 13 council meeting that Lewis called Fisher to say there had been a meeting with Hill and that the financial terms of the agreement needed to be reworked. Fisher was told to deliver $125,000 to Lewis by 10 a.m. the morning of the vote, one source says.
Fisher, no doubt being told what to do by his FBI handlers, stalled over the high number. The stall produced other phone calls that were recorded by the FBI.
The next day, Hill postponed the vote for May 11, saying "There has been significant progress made in working with an adjacent homeowners group, but we have not been able to get all of those issues resolved."
However, no opponents had shown up for the hearing that day.
By May 11, Fisher had negotiated the $50,000 reduced upfront fee that was exchanged at the Exxon station not long before Hill finally moved to approve the project.
To date, no ground has been broken on the Dallas West Villas.
My point here, Todd, which I think was stated pretty clearly, was that the Laura Miller issue may (or may not) resonate with the jury. I think it's a mistake a for reporter to write only about evidence or testimony that tends to support an outcome that the reporter wants to see occur. Remember, Todd, we're not supposed to be members of law enforcement, even when we curry their favor as sources. That's sort of an Achilles heel for a lot of reporters who get too close to the cops.
Posted On: Tuesday, Jul. 14 2009 @ 8:31AMZOMG Bensman. It's called a link. I promise to freakin' click on it if you post that instead of your entire story in a blog comment.
Posted On: Tuesday, Jul. 14 2009 @ 9:12AM"But officer, that other guy was speeding, too."
Has that ever worked?
Posted On: Tuesday, Jul. 14 2009 @ 9:31AM"...too far away for detailed character assessment..."
Best line of month.
Posted On: Tuesday, Jul. 14 2009 @ 9:34AMI agree that this stuff with Laura Miller doesn't look good at all. The amounts involved are breathtaking, to say the least. What happens to leftover campaign funds when an officeholders leaves office?
My personal opinion is that smart politicians and contributors know that there is an "understanding" when outsized contributions (such as those made to Laura Miller) are offered and accepted.
If Laura Miller didn't perform the tricks she was paid for, she had to know the money spigot would be turned off.
Posted On: Tuesday, Jul. 14 2009 @ 9:35AMIt all stinks but thes guys were taking bribes. It's always been that way in South Dallas and the poor people in that district have suffered because off it.
Posted On: Tuesday, Jul. 14 2009 @ 9:59AMUnless the prosecution comes up with something better than already revealed, then a hung jury or "not guilty" will happen. Makeup of jury dictates either of these scenarios.
Posted On: Tuesday, Jul. 14 2009 @ 10:17AMThis is a perfect example of why Laura Miller turned out to be such a disappointment as mayor. Potashnik was not the only one giving her money which is why she turned on us who elected her.
Posted On: Tuesday, Jul. 14 2009 @ 10:19AMAn associate of mine mentioned the Laura Miller tie a couple of years ago and I wrote it off as being too hypocritical for Ms. Miller. But look at the scenario now. Ms. Miller was caught and given a chance to plead...her leaving office was an escape to not be prosecuted. But look who's left holding the bag. An all black defense table.
Posted On: Tuesday, Jul. 14 2009 @ 10:32AMlmg's comment above is flat-out not true. I did battle with LM over lots of stuff. But the one thing nobody will ever pin on her is corruption. By the way, the contention of the defense in this trial is not that LM was corrupt. It's that contributions are traded for access all the time, and it's not corruption: it's politics.
Posted On: Tuesday, Jul. 14 2009 @ 11:29AMSad that this trial is apparently a waste of taxpayer money. The real decision was made when they were able to determine the race of the jury.
You mention Laura Miller to a group of black folks in Dallas and they could have video tape of Don Hill taking cash in wheelbarrows and it wouldn't matter.
Yeah, we all know it's been going on like this since the 70s, at least.
Let's face it, the main reason South Dallas has remained a craphole for 40 years or more is because their very own elected leaders have been cashing in on every project.
Think about how many projects have been lost to South Dallas over the years because the developers couldn't (or wouldn't) cooperate with demands for bribes and fat do-nothing contracts? How many business have just turned away from Southern Dallas purely because of the corrupt leadership?
Dangle-oh Lee and crew are just the latest in a long, long string of modernized pimps trying to make South Dallas their bitch. House niggers who are gonna wind up learning a new meaning of the phrase.
I love it when Crenshaw's "black boil"s! Sandra, let me know if any of your postings are copyrighted; I've been saving up all of your cute sayings and am thinking about publishing a coffee table book.
Is your comment regarding LM not being investigated rhetorical? If not, the simple, simple response is that she was above board with her finances and those on trial were not.
I know you are an intelligent woman so I'm assuming it was rhetorical...
"black boil"...is that like a black hole?
Posted On: Tuesday, Jul. 14 2009 @ 6:31PMspoetzl, are you an equal opportunity critic? Jim said that when blacks ask why Laura Miller was not investigated it makes white people's blood boil. I responded that this notion makes my BLACK boil. All of us bleed RED. White is void of color and having pigment distinguishes me from white people. I started to write it makes my black a-- boil, but since it burns my entire being, I left it black with haught.
Look, all I am saying here is that the PUBLIC-- all colors--- can and SHOULD ask why. If LM was above board, just respond. (Just tell us what is the opposition to the retirement home, Atkins) An informed electorate is needed in a democratic society. Todd Benson did a good job in pointing all of the seediness of Don' alledged conduct found during an INVESTIGATION.
What is not being reported here is that Crime depends on what the law is. LM's husband was a big advocate of campaign finance ethics in Austin. Laura received a large contribution DAYS before a vote. In Austin, that is prohibited. but Dallas has no such policy, therefore it was not illegal only because of the absence of a prhobition. Remember Al, changed his mind about Yellow Cab then don't forget Laura was opposed to the project but changed her mind after a heft "contribution" Was she influenced by the money? We'll never know---no case is being made before a federal grand jury. Also unreported here is that the City of Dallas has a campaign contribution limit. (San Antonio has a $100.00 limit,Leppert give the OU tickets back) The developer gave the max in his name, another in his wife's name, and sometimes another in his father's name. LM's reports show the limit in the wife's married name and another limit in the wife's maiden's name. Did the wife exceed the limit or did LM REPORT the over the limit contribution as two different contributors. Did Laura name an amount that Potashnick had to reach? We may never know. It is illegal to accept contributions from corporations. Did these funds come from their company or their personal bank account. I understand that there is evidence in the Hill case that there were efforts to fix the books to make it look like personal but it was really the corporation's Money. Will we know if the same exists in LM's coffers? Probably not. Were LM's contributions in cash or check? It is a felony to give or receive cash contributions. But again it depends on what the law is. Cash limits is a state law of which the ethics police depend on a complaint to be filed--then they investigate. No one asked for an investigation on LM. Fischer asked the FBI to investigate Hill. No complaint--no investigation. The FBI didn't go on a fishing expedition and racially target these black officials. When an alledged victim comes forth, the state,local, and federal law enforcers are required to investigate. When Fantroy was caught stealing from Paul Quinn, white people did not come after him, black people in his District did. I don't have a problem with Hill being held accountable, my black boils when White people here, act as though Laura was above reproach. If there is evidence that LM reported the money as a campaign contribution and then spent it for personal use like Ms.Rufus Shaw did, then this act would be a state felony and if more than $5,000, a federal offense. Without an investigation of Laura's expenses, one will never know IF she committed a crime. Senator West used campaign funds to pay rent for his campaign office at a building he owned. A State no no. Councilman Atkins pays for his office space--- calls it a year round campaign office --the city doesn't say he can't--- so it's a go. So just because Laura reported the money doesn't mean she is innocent of any wrong doings. Remember her phones were never tapped. One thing about black people is that they don't condone wrong, they just want to know why white people shouldn't be held accountable. THERE IS NEVER ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE PUBLIC ASKING IF THE FBI INVESTIGATED A WHITE PUBLIC OFFICIAL. For the record, most of the allegations made here against LM do not meet the federal bribery statues, that is unless the Potashnicks bring forth evidence, otherwise. It still won't define the intent of the bribed--the prosecution presents the evidence and the representatives of the public on a jury will decide. Will Potashnick, who we are told is going to plead guilty that He and his family bribed the accused, testify that the money he gave the co-defendants--- was in fact intended to somehow get to Don or Lee (public officials who are accused of exercising an official act for personal gain.) The question EVERYONE should be asking is-----"Will Potashnick be required to give an account of his dealings with Miller and OTHER government officials black AND WHITE." Public Corruption is #4 on the FBI's top ten crimes. They have a hotline.
spoetzl, are you an equal opportunity critic? Jim said that when blacks ask why Laura Miller was not investigated it makes white people's blood BOIL. I responded that this notion makes my BLACK boil. All of us bleed RED. White is void of color and having pigment distinguishes me from white people. I started to write it makes my black A-- boil, but since it burns my entire being, I left it BLACK with haught.
Look, all I am saying here is that the PUBLIC-- all colors--- can and SHOULD ask why. If LM was above board, just state your case. (Just tell us what is the opposition to the retirement home, Atkins) An informed electorate is needed in a democratic society. Todd Benson did a good job in pointing out all of the seediness of Don's alledged conduct found during an INVESTIGATION. What is not being reported here is that Crime depends on what the law is. LM's husband was a big advocate of campaign finance ethics in Austin. Laura received a large contribution DAYS before a vote. At the Capitol, that is prohibited. but Dallas has no such policy, therefore it was not illegal only because of the absence of a prohibition. Remember when Al changed his mind about Yellow Cab? then don't forget Laura was opposed to the multi-family project but changed her mind after a hefty "contribution" wink wink . Was she influenced by the money? We'll never know because no case is being made before a federal grand jury. Jim what court order did you access before exonerating Laura? Also unreported here is that the City of Dallas has a campaign contribution limit. (San Antonio has a $100.00 limit, Mayor Give the OU tickets back Leppert) The developer gave the max to Laura in his name, another whopper in his wife's name, and sometimes another in his father's name. LM's reports a capped contribution in his wife's married name and another limit in the wife's maiden's name. Did the wife exceed the limit or did LM REPORT the over the limit contribution as two DIFFERENT contributors. Did Laura name an amount that Postashnick had to reach? We may never know. It is ILLEGAL to accept contributions from corporations. Did the funds for Laura’s come from their company or their personal bank account. I understand that there is evidence in the Hill case that there were efforts to fix the books to make it look like personal but it was really the corporation's Money. Will we know if the same exists in LM's coffers? Probably not. Were LM's contributions in cash or check? It is a felony to give or receive cash contributions. But again it depends on what the law is. Cash limits is a state law of which the ethics police depend on a complaint to be filed--then they investigate. No one asked for an investigation on LM. Fischer asked the FBI to investigate Hill. No complaint--no investigation. The FBI didn't go on a fishing expedition and racially target these black officials. When an alleged victim comes forth, the state, local, and federal law enforcers are required to investigate. When Fantroy was caught stealing from Paul Quinn, white people did not come after him, black people in his District did. I don't have a problem with Hill being held accountable, but my black boils when White people here, act as though Laura was above reproach. If there is evidence that LM reported the money as a campaign contribution and then spent it for personal use like Ms. Rufus Shaw did, then this act would be a state felony and if more than $5,000, a federal offense. Without an investigation of Laura's expenses, one will never know IF she committed a crime. Senator West used campaign funds to pay rent for his campaign office at a building he owned. A State no no. Councilman Atkins pays for his office space--- calls it a year round campaign office --the city doesn't say he can't do it --- so it's a go. So just because Laura reported the money doesn't mean she is innocent of any wrong doings. Remember her phones were never tapped. One thing about black people is that they don't condone wrong, they just want to know why white people shouldn't be held accountable. THERE IS NEVER ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE PUBLIC ASKING IF THE FBI INVESTIGATED A WHITE PUBLIC OFFICIAL. For the record, most of the allegations made here against LM do not meet the federal bribery statues, that is unless the Potashnicks bring forth evidence, otherwise. It still won't define the intent of the bribed-----the prosecution presents the evidence and the representatives of the public on a jury will decide. Will Potashnick, who we are told is going to plead guilty that He and his family bribed the accused, testify that the money he gave the co-defendants--- was in fact intended to somehow get to Don or Lee (public officials who are accused of exercising an official act for personal gain.) The question EVERYONE should be asking is-----"Will Potashnick be required to give an account of his dealings with Miller and OTHER government officials black AND WHITE." Public Corruption is #4 on the FBI's top ten crimes. They have a hotline.
It is the fact - and the way - that contributions are traded for access these days that makes all of this activity operate as glorified bribery.
I advocate the following: all elections MUST have a specified season. On a given date, no more than three months from the election in question (and that includes federal elections other than presidential, which I would make one year before), elected officials or candidates can go for as much money as they can get for whatever campaign they are running and all of it must be publicly disclosed and tracked. After that, NO CONTRIBUTIONS OR CAMPAIGNING whatsoever, period. For anything. Any gift or contribution of money or things of value to an elected would constitute bribery automatically resulting in prison time upon conviction.
But that makes sense - which is why no one will ever implement this solution. I say indict Miller, indict them all, because the system is rotten to the core.
Posted On: Sunday, Jul. 19 2009 @ 9:14AMLarry, your proposal is similar to legislation that was championed by Laura's husband and passed for the members of Texas Legislature. That is why those in the know feel that Laura KNEW her prevote contributions were UNETHICAL even if they were not illegal at the local level. That's why it makes it hard for Schultze and Benson to convince us that simply because Laura reported the money that the timeliness of the transaction should not be at least SUSPECT, ie JimS says: "I did battle with LM over lots of stuff. But the one thing nobody will ever pin on her is corruption."
Jim, the Bible says: power corrupts. Add that to the book, Spoetzl
Larry, your proposal is similar to legislation that was championed by Laura's husband and passed for the members of Texas Legislature. That is why those in the know feel that Laura KNEW her prevote contributions were UNETHICAL even if they were not illegal at the local level. That's why it makes it hard for Schultze and Benson to convince us that simply because Laura reported the money that the timeliness of the transaction should not be at least SUSPECT, ie JimS says: "I did battle with LM over lots of stuff. But the one thing nobody will ever pin on her is corruption."
Jim, the Bible says: power corrupts. Add that to the book, Spoetzl
You can keep on passing the buck ! BUT the Buck stops here atGrandPrairi Contractors. See what the best does for u.















