36 comment(s) / Post a Comment
"A walkable neighborhood means situating amenities such as stores, dry cleaners, libraries, bakeries and restaurants within about a three-quarter-of- a-mile walk."
Part of this is personal choice. My office is at Fitzhugh and Central. My Bank, Dry Cleaners, and auto repair shop are a walk away. I combine it in cooler months with a walk on Katy Trail. I schedule lunches close enough to walk.
This is the toughest time of year, but even then it's acceptable for short walks.
If it was a bit easier, I'd take the train downtown.
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 3:08PMGood luck with all that. The people that live in the 'spurbs' as he calls them live there for a reason and aren't planning on moving closer to downtown anytime soon. It's not feasible for people who don't work in downtown, which out of the 6 million plus people in the metro area is probably a pretty small faction.
Gimme a 3000 sq ft 'cookie cutter' house, exemplary schools and low to no crime anyday over a 1200 sq ft dump with gang ridden schools anyday. The 20 minute drive is worth it.
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 3:55PMBleh, you're so full of shit. You can't even get from downtown to University Park in 20 minutes during rush hour. Pretending that you can make it to Allen, Frisco, or McKinney that quickly is just plain ridiculous.
No one is arguing that folks from the 'spurbs are likely to be moving to Dallas's most dangerous and crime-ridden neighborhoods. But to suggest that they wouldn't (or shouldn't) consider Kessler Park, Lakewood, Little Forest Hills, Uptown, Winnetka Heights, M-Streets, or Oak Lawn reflects your ignorance. The 'spurbs' are yesterdays news. Count the "for sale"/"foreclosure" signs on your next "20 minute" drive home if you don't believe me.
My guess is that you live in the 'spurbs because you're a closet (or perhaps overt?) racist who can't tolerate the idea of living near someone who's a little different than you. Or perhaps you're just a typical douchebag who wanted to impress friends with a faux-brick facade, engraved house number, and a media room on some treeless, regal-sounding road (e.g. "Canterbury Trail").
Have fun at your next H.O.A. meeting with the rest of the crypto-nazis.
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 4:08PMGod Forbid I have a different viewpoint than you. who said I work in Downtown? -- I don't. My main reason for living in the burbs is all about money. I refuse to pay $250-$400k for a tiny 80 year old house in the M streets where the douche-baggery btw is at an all time high. Then tack on the extra $400-$1000 a month to send my kids to a private school where they can get a decent education and it just doesn't 'add up' to me. Different viewpoints is all, but instead of name calling I'll instead respect your point of view.
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 4:12PMIf there were more cool re-sale shops I'd move from Plano to Lower Greenville. Definitely.
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 4:14PMI hate the suburbs, but maybe less venom and more thoughtful discussion? Spewing venom at suburbanites is just going to make them call us elitist and say they don't want to be part of our community anyway.
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 4:16PMIndeed, Easy There, some of my best friends live in suburbs.
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 4:18PMProvided the suburbanites posting to this board can discuss living in Dallas without stereotyping the entire city as "1200 sq ft dumps with gang ridden schools," I have no problem turning down the venom.
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 4:21PMWhen my grandmother moved to Dallas, she probably considered the M Streets to be the suburbs. It's still a pretty suburban-like neighborhood (single family houses going on for miles in every direction).
When I think walkable and urban, I think something considerably more close-in with far more mixed-use neighborhoods.
The East Dallas neighborhood that my wife's step mother lives in looks just like the Wylie neighborhood my wife's mother lives in except that the houses in Wylie are 30-40 years newer. Neither is truly walkable or urban.
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 4:23PMMy apologies Anti-Bleh... i wasn't referring to all of Dallasites in that way. I was stating what I could get in Dallas at the equivocal price/taxes that I pay by living in the burbs... Atleast the last time I looked that's about what $160k got you out there.
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 4:24PMWow, Anti-Bleh really has me sold on moving to Dallas to be with more open-minded, friendly people like him. There are, obviously, many reasons to want to live in the suburbs and just as many to live in the city. What I don't get is why everyone is so angry and bitter, feeling like they have to defend their own choice as an absolute right or wrong.
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 4:40PMGuys c'mon. Let's not get along. Is more fun. Love the sarcasm and truthfulness of Anti-Bleh.
Anti-Bleh I just added this to my dictionary:
Suburbanite: Douchebag who wanted to impress friends with a faux-brick facade, engraved house number, and a media room on some treeless, regal-sounding road (e.g. "Canterbury Trail").
LOL
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 4:40PMWell, I have lived in walkable neighborhoods in Dallas, Boston and San Jose (SJ was kind of walkable). And I have lived in the burbs here in Dallas and a few other places. Good and bad for both. I would rather be back in downtown but for the girlfriend and her kids. The schools are awesome and luckily, the neighbors are good people. My girlfriend telecommutes and I am a currently unemployed soccer watching fool. GO USA!
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 4:49PMI grew up in Little Forest Hills and Munger Heights and was groomed from birth to be a "spurb" hater.
When my in-laws gave us the down payment $$ to buy a house close to them (they're in Farmers Branch- now that's really Bleh) we chose an older neighborhood in S. Carrollton. After we baught the house I bitched for two years! I wanted to be in Oak Cliff or somewhere else "cool".
Once I got over myself, I realized how great it is. In fact, it's a lot like Old East Dallas in the 80's and early 90's before all the republicans moved in. It's totally integrated w/ awesome, cheap, weird restaurants and grocery stores. Going down I-35 I really am 20 mins from everything.
Oh and to top it off, any time I've ever called the cops they're on it within minutes! That never happened to me in Dallas.
I'll always be a Dallas girl but Carrollton is really stealing my heart.
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 4:52PMThat's right, everyone who lives in the suburbs is a douchebag racist crypto-nazi, and everyone who lives in Dallas is like the people on LATFH.
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 4:53PMApparently people living in Dallas haven't been to Uptown recently. I think the douche-bag factor is slightly higher in Addison, but not by much.
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 4:56PMWasik says: "Two of my favorite examples of "people places" are the pedestrian mall in Charlottesville, Virginia and the ramblas in Barcelona…In the Spanish city, when my wife and I were vacationing a few years ago, we walked from our hotel in the middle of the city to the beach and downtown neighborhoods. It was several miles, but we didn't have to cross a major highway and ate, shopped and people-watched the whole way with great delight."
Hope he kept a tight grip on his wallet while in Barcelona. If not, the pick-pockets would have quickly relieved him of it.
I've been to Barcelona, and even stayed in a hotel just off the Ramblas. At the upper end is the Placa de Catalunya (and a convenient underground Metro stop), while the lower end is right on the harbor...just across a pretty major street (some might even call that street a minor highway!) overseen by a large statue of Columbus. It is indeed a nice place to visit, but I can't help but remember the view out our hotel window. Just across the way was a run down building, with rotting wood, debris scattered around, and not exactly up to the standards of probably anyone posting here. It would be an understatement to say the living conditions just across from our very modestly priced hotel would not have been up to the very minimum housing standards set forth in the Dallas Code of Ordinances.
Sure, we walked all day, saw the Antoni Gaudi cathedral, ate far more tapas than we ever should have, strolled on the beach (while the Ramblas ends right in the water, the actual beach is about a mile or so walk to the east), and even enjoyed the street mimes. But it seemed to me to be a bifurcated world - either you had money and enjoyed a comfortable standard of living, or you lived in conditions most people here would likely characterize as "slums."
We enjoyed our trip and we are very glad we went. Might even go back some day and see more of what we missed on that all too brief visit. The public transit worked well, it was easy to get around, even between countries (it is more difficult to travel between Dallas and Ft. Worth by train!) The people were nice, the weather good, and the sights fantastic.
But I wouldn't choose to live there. I personally prefer the 'Burbs.
Bleh, I would agree that there is usually a premium for living closer to the city in a good neighborhood, but then again you would pay a premium for living in Southlake as opposed to Rockwall and neither are close to downtown. Dallas has some good schools and some bad schools, some got great rating recently. But, Irving has some good and bad as most areas.
Anyway, it is all about priorities. Walkalbe areas don't always have to be downtown, Legacy Park is an example of this, maybe not the best, but still a local example not close to downtown.
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 5:10PMAnd my apologies as well, Bleh. I'm just sick of getting defensive when my friends act as if I am a child-abuser because my kid goes to an exemplary-rated DISD elementary school. For some reason, your post became the target of my mid-afternoon frustration.
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 5:14PMNo worries man, it's not the first time I've been the target of someone's mid-afternoon frustration. If anything it's good to see somebody passionate about their hometown.
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 5:32PMReligion of bacon - thank you so much for LATFH!
And I know there are a few good, and even great DISD schools, but you will never, ever, get families with children to move in from the burbs until DISD can compete with the suburban schools. Even Richardson, which is far from a wealthy suburb, does a great job in some pretty poor areas.
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 6:30PMFind out your walkablity index http://www.walkscore.com/
- e.g. "Bungalow Heaven" Junius Heights Historic District in East Dallas, an old 'streetcar suburb' (75 out of 100 Very Walkable):
Lakewood Library 0.30 Mi
Coffee Shops 0.36 Mi
Penne Pommodoro 0.55 Mi
XmaxGames, LLC0.59 Mi
Coffee Company .56 Mi
Balcony Club 0.4 Mi
Lakewood Theater 0.4 Mi
Lakewood Tavern0.42 Mi
Lakewood Landing0.42 Mi
Cock & Bull Neighbo0.43 Mi
Lakewood Bar & Gril0.49 Mi
Tipperary Inn 0.55 Mi
Cantina Laredo 0.84 Mi
AND Lipscomb Elementary, Exemplary 4 years - Woodrow Wilson High, a Newsweek Top School in America.
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 6:39PMI live in the spurb of Richardson and I could literally spit on Target, Lowes, Albertsons, dry cleaners, a gym, a dozen fast food restaurants and yes, a donut shop. But I will gladly pay the premium of purchasing, insuring, maintaining, and fueling my car to avoid playing frogger with my stroller (that will seat only 2 of my 3 kids) on a 6-lane road, in the 105 degree heat, so I can go to the grocery store to buy only what I'm able to stuff in the compartment beneath the seats of my stroller. Ok, ok, so now you say I'm environmentally irresponsible for having so many kids - right? Help save a tree by not purchasing this ridiculous piece of crap.
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 6:42PM@Bleh I was stating what I could get in Dallas at the equivocal price/taxes that I pay by living in the burbs... Atleast the last time I looked that's about what $160k got you out there.
I don't think you understood the point of the post. What you bought for $160k in the suburbs is unsustainable, it doesn't make sense.
If you read the link you would see what the book is about:
The roots of the worst housing bust in generations lie in the mythology of the American dream: buy as much house as possible, move away from urban centers, home prices will always go up, the schools are “better.” The foundation of the dream itself is faulty; indeed, the desire that “every man have his castle” is bankrupting us.
Today’s crisis in home values is the least of suburbia’s problems. The Cul-de-Sac Syndrome details the intimate connections between home ownership, economics, and the environment. John Wasik provides powerful insights into how the U.S. suburban lifestyle became unsustainable.
Wasik’s observations are firmly grounded in exclusive on-the-ground research, interviews with thought leaders, and the latest studies and statistics. He exposes the untold truths about home ownership: “green” isn’t always so “green,” life isn’t cheaper after accounting for gas, water, and taxes, and modern suburban living isn’t so idyllic considering the toll it takes on our health. However, some are attempting to revive suburbia, and Wasik shows us how. He offers insights into ways to improve our current lifestyle: eco-friendly communities, rebuilding and reclaiming inner cities, improvements in home design, and more.
No one is debating that you bought "more" in the suburbs, the thesis of the book is that the illusion of quality of life, value, long term value and "quality" is just that, an unreal illusion. You may be feeling pretty smug with your oversized, cheaply built track house with a big lawn, what you bought is ultimately harmful to society as a whole and most likely, soon, you.
YOU are the whole thesis of his book and if you are going to debate the merits of his argument that "buy as much house as possible, move away from urban centers, home prices will always go up, the schools are “better.” The foundation of the dream itself is faulty; indeed, the desire that “every man have his castle” is bankrupting us. is incorrect, a smarter way of doing it is not pointing out the very things he is contesting i.e. Gimme a 3000 sq ft 'cookie cutter' house, exemplary schools and low to no crime anyday over a 1200 sq ft dump with gang ridden schools anyday. The 20 minute drive is worth it. because his whole thesis is that argument is misguided, unsustainable, unaffordible and largely incorrect.
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 7:11PMSo people who enjoy living in the suburbs are actually living an "unreal illusion" (not even a real one...) and being "harmful to society?" And this is "firmly grounded" in interviews with "thought leaders?" Personally, I am (to borrow the words of Schutze) "deeply frightened."
Just curious, when most of the 'burbites move back into Dallas, won't that result in massive overcrowding? Is the idea that Dallas will then re-annex the depopulated suburbs, so that by definition they'll no longer be surburbs and it will be ok to live there again? Or is there some critical radius from downtown Dallas beyond which human life was simply not meant to exist?
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 7:55PMBleh - before you move 50 miles to Frisclosure you might want to do a little homework on the elementary school which serves the M Streets:
http://www.dallasisd.org/demo/schoolinfo/eszones2009/JacksonStonewall2009.pdf
It's a Blue-Ribbon, Exemplary School.
BTW the high school as mentioned above (Stonewall feeds in) is at 637 on the Newsweek list of the 1500 top schools in the USA (of 22,000). The best Frisco could do was 1283.
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 8:05PMBut the M Streets are part of the problem. They just happen to be slightly closer to the CBD than some other places. But they're still, suburban-style streets with single-family housing without the needed amenities to sustain one's existence within 3/4ths of a mile.
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 8:28PMI'd like to thank the Dallas residents who have commented here for once again reminding us all that the residents of the city are what has made it the shit hole it is today.
Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 24 2009 @ 10:44PMMy problem with the suburbs has nothing to do with where they are located. I dislike the idea that the modern American family requires 4000 square feet of living space. I think that homes of this size isolate families from each other, and I dislike them whether they are an hour away in Frisco, or in Highland Park/Preston Hollow, a relatively short commute to downtown. I'm not sure why people on this board are praising the M Streets either. Those houses are overpriced, and filled with young professionals who wanted a trendy place to live for a few years until moving to Highland Park when their kids entered school. That worked as long as real estate there was going up, but it doesn't any more. The short timelines of residence lead owners to do only minimal upkeep on the properties, so you've got houses that are mostly in disrepair, or else are priced at astronomical values.
And for the record, I don't actually think school districts in the suburbs are any better than anywhere else. They are just filled with fewer poor people's children. But it's not as though everyone living in Dallas is so progressive. Some put up with public school at the elementary levels, but unless their kid goes to a magnet after that, it's generally off to private school they go. Look at the racial breakdown of the district if you don't accept that.
Posted On: Thursday, Jun. 25 2009 @ 9:43AMThanks for the walkscore link.
0.56 Mi El Rancho Supermark
1.62 Mi Fiesta Mart
0.60 Mi Chevron Marsh
0.68 Mi 7-Eleven
1.60 Mi 7-Eleven
0.56 Mi Jack In the Box
0.58 Mi Wendy's
0.68 Mi Subway
0.68 Mi Little Caesar's Piz
1.52 Mi Jack In the Box
1.53 Mi Domino's Pizza
0.64 Mi A Step Up Lounge
Maybe the suburbs wouldn't be so bad afterall.
Posted On: Thursday, Jun. 25 2009 @ 11:44AMNot so bad if you like Fast Food chains and franchises?
I don't think I would trade White Rock Lake, the Lakewood Theater, Balcony Club, Tallulah, Scalini's, Legal Grounds, Matt's, Times Ten Winery, The Wine Therapist, Lakewood Landing, The Gold Rush and the Library for Chevron, 7-Eleven, Wendy's, Subway and Little Caesar's.
Personally I prefer Hollywood Heights to the M-Streets. But the M-Streets Tudors are wonderful, exquisite and rare in a great and yes, walkable location - therefore justifying their prices. Per square foot, they are less than Lakewood Proper - yet both are served by blue-ribbon elementaries.
I don't think you can prove any mass exodus to HPISD from here - most of us are not too keen on that lifestyle and embrace East Dallas. If you want to talk overpriced, talk about 'the bubble'. What most folks do not understand about that place is that the cost of a home is merely the price of admission. You will pay much more to participate.
Posted On: Thursday, Jun. 25 2009 @ 12:40PMMark my words...Winnetka Heights will be the next hot spot...especially after the Davis Street redevelopment comes into fruition.
Posted On: Thursday, Jun. 25 2009 @ 12:55PMMaybe I am in contact with a skewed sample of M Street residents then. Most say they will stay there "a few years". Some move East, some move to HP/UP, some move to Preston Hollow, and some even end up in Plano or Richardson.
But I agree w/ the idea that people in HPISD are not getting a "free" education. You will easily spend a private school's tuition on the clothing, trips, private tutors, private coaches and other things your children will need there just to keep up w/ the neighbors.
Posted On: Thursday, Jun. 25 2009 @ 12:58PM@NorthOakCliffer-
Winnetka Heights has already seen some crazy price appreciation. Still plenty of affordable places there, but I think Kidd Springs area (Cedar Hill and adjacent streets) is next to 'pop'. Close proximity to Bishop Arts, and I still think the homes over there are fairly well preserved/maintained.















