42 comment(s) / Post a Comment
that's the weakest, piece of shit flash mob in the history of weak, piece of shit flash mobs.
Posted On: Monday, Apr. 27 2009 @ 4:18PMSomehow I don't think that Zack de la Rocha would be very supportive of the city hotel.
Posted On: Monday, Apr. 27 2009 @ 4:18PMDo they not realize that the city is the metaphoric "machine" in band name Rage Against the Machine?
Do they think that taxpayers are said "machine"?
I hope that Rage reunites in a courtroom to sue the shit out of them.
Posted On: Monday, Apr. 27 2009 @ 4:20PMThe irony of using RAtM is delicious, thanks for sharing. If I went back to the first spot, I would find that the vast majority of featured "opponents" to props 1&2 all have at least an indirect financial stake in this city-owned hotel being built. Follow the money...
Posted On: Monday, Apr. 27 2009 @ 4:20PMThis is just awful...
Who's the creative/marketing team responsible for this again? Or was it, as I recall, some "grassroots" effort or some such? Right...
This is a prime example of "not doing their homework" - Trust me, I know, coming from having worked in advertising at national agencies and small shops here in town for about 8 years prior to where I am now, I saw it all the time... But this, sheesh...
But you want to know the really sad thing about all this is? There are people who think this is "ground-breaking" and "edgy" - and they are just so proud of it...
...
Somehow I don't think that Zack de la Rocha would be very supportive of the city hotel.
Zack's a good lil' commie, he'd love it.
Posted On: Monday, Apr. 27 2009 @ 4:43PMWow, you are some angry people.
I support the hotel but this is not a good way to get votes.
Posted On: Monday, Apr. 27 2009 @ 4:55PMI love the fact that they use a song which makes references to bodies dropping.
In response, I think the other side needs to do a montage of the Mayor to Slayer's "Angel of Death". At least, that would make some sense.
Posted On: Monday, Apr. 27 2009 @ 4:59PMDoes anyone have a place where I can crash for awhile? After a late night partying Friday, I came home, only to be given the 5th degree by my parents.... wanting to know where I had been, etc?
It was really none of their business!
Anyway, one of my friends ratted me out... told pops that I was working on trying to get "a really cool" convention center hotel built, because, like, we need that economic engine, you dig?
Well, pops kicked me out... so, like I said, I'm lookin' for a place to stay... at least 'til my check from The Richards Group shows up in the mail.
Pops shoulda never crossed me-- I'd take a bullet for my main man, Tom Leppert!
Posted On: Monday, Apr. 27 2009 @ 5:12PMAngries - you are taking the bait...
Posted On: Monday, Apr. 27 2009 @ 5:12PMDo these people have any idea how much it costs to license a RATM song for use in any advertising campaign?
I can't imagine these people would spend the quarter of million dollars just to procure a mechanical license for something like this.
If this gets backs to RATM's publishing company, somebody is going to be on the hook for a VERY large sum of money.
Think taxpayers will eventually end up paying the settlement?
I will be the first to admit that I have a serious lack of style.
But... when it comes to substance, I have plenty.
Here is my take on the hotel issue (9 minutes long... I slap RIP around at about 7 minutes if you feel like skipping ahead)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJq04Mi6Ofc
Total video costs $0 (yes I get it, it shows)
Posted On: Monday, Apr. 27 2009 @ 5:33PMRed umbrellas.
How appropriate for a bunch of kids too young to remember the lessons of the Soviet Union, East Germany, Albania, Czechoslovakia and all those other places where the government owned everything.
You know -- the countries that don't exist any more.
Well, since they are using socialist rock bands why not try MC5's "Kick Out The Jams"?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iM6nasmkg7A&feature=related
Mayor Tom could sing and do the intro. Carroway and Price could be his Fred "Sonic" Smith and Wayne Kramer.
Posted On: Monday, Apr. 27 2009 @ 5:44PMLOL - this is some funny shit...
It's cool brah - It's totally grassroots yo!
Posted On: Monday, Apr. 27 2009 @ 5:56PM@Bad Seed
Congrats friend. That was the absolute lamest thing I have read in a very long time. You obviously meant it to be taken seriously which is...all the sadder...
You know, I am pretty against the hotel. Not because I believe it represents "communism" (state ownership is part of many healthy capitalist democracies worldwide in moderation.) Not because I think Leppert and his pals are commies (are you freaking kidding?) I'm against it because it's not worth the risk and we'd be better off concentrating risk, money, and effort elsewhere. BUT, it's tough listening to all these idiotic, uptight, arrogant, fools who think that because they made particular set of life choices (to buy a house, be a protestant, be a wanker, etc.) and are a particular age that they are the only ones entitled to an opinion...That's ignorant and it doesn't help anyone's cause and it's definitely NOT an attitude that will foster any kind of positive civic engagement...Please stop being angry old fools, half the things you're talking about have nothing to do with this debate...
Posted On: Monday, Apr. 27 2009 @ 5:59PMI still do not know why a bunch of 20-somethings, who probably don't pay County taxes directly(renting), care about a hotel built for people who do not live in this city. I'm being serious on this one. What's in it for them? Grass-roots for what?
Posted On: Monday, Apr. 27 2009 @ 6:04PMAwww, come on! Why does everyone have to be so negative? Unlike the "Vote Yes" side, these "Vote No" campaigners don't have the $6 million budget that is from "one man's deep pockets".... Passing props 1 and 2 benefits his own personal agenda.
I think this video is freakin' awesome. And, the freeze was a cool idea. Keep up the great work, kids!
Posted On: Monday, Apr. 27 2009 @ 6:06PM@lemurskin
I think the answer to your question is that Leppert and Co. have managed to convince a lot of people of different ages, some who pay direct property taxes and some who don't (absolutely irrelevant...) that this hotel is part of the overall continuing effort to reshape Dallas along the lines laid out in the "Forward Dallas" plan and other urban design initiatives.
This is probably particularly appealing to a younger generation of Americans with starkly different core values (that are NOT disappearing as they get older so save your condescension and opinion that everyone will transform into YOU as they age lol). This is a generation that holds urban living as a higher form of life than boomers and even X'ers raised to love suburbia. Younger generations also are more comfortable with and desiring of diversity. This is more common in dense urban environments. There are a whole host of reasons but what it boils down to is that they see this as a way for the city to move forward towards greater urbanization/urban diversity. Of course the whole argument is crap and there are better ways to accomplish this in my opinion, but I think that sums up their support and the support of many. And you can hear it in their language and the language of Leppert and others, the idea that Dallas has to keep "moving forward." Again I disagree but being condescending to younger people simply because they're younger and have a different point of view than you is immature and unproductive.
Regardless of what anyone thinks, younger workers are necessary for our city to continue to thrive, (unless you wanna all the bad parts of Pittsburgh without the Universities/natural splendor...) If anyone as a Dallasite wants the city to move forward not being able to attract young workers is not going to be a plus. Of course I don't think that means we need a hotel but this issue is a lot more complex than screaming with your mouth frothing "you don't pay no darn taxes shut the hell up" or lame and totally inaccurate satirical depictions of youth using slang from the 70's lol.
Posted On: Monday, Apr. 27 2009 @ 6:17PM@Jay
I think you kind of missed the point I was making. I am a "young person" and I know that most of my friends could care less one way or the other about this stupid hotel.
What I was mocking was some of the obviously fake stuff associated with this R.I.P. Dallas thing (i.e. a bunch of stuff supposedly written by us that, in fact, is a "totally inaccurate (unintentionally) satirical depiction of youth using slang from the 70's."
I don't have a firm opinion (yet) about this hotel, but I can tell you that R.I.P. thing is a bunch of phony nonsense.
Posted On: Monday, Apr. 27 2009 @ 6:43PM@Jay
Well said. We may have different opinions on the hotel but at least you have a firm grasp on what is going on. It's nice to read comments that are informative instead of people attacking other people.
@Chris
"It's nice to read comments that are informative instead of people attacking other people."
You wouldn't happen to be the same Chris that was personally attacking Trey Garrison and Angela Hunt over on the DMN City Hall Blog, would you?
(http://cityhallblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/04/angela-hunt-steamed-over-vote.html#comments)
A few choice quotes from "Chris":
"Good old Trey Garrison -- I left his site because he couldn't spell people's names right, claimed the Vote Yes camp never told its volunteers they'd weren;t going to have to worry about working any polls south of Interstate 30 (when they did), and can barely go five minutes without calling people names (idiot, pissy, arrogant, braggy)."
"Imagine what it would be like working with this woman [Angela Hunt] in a real job..."
I'm not sure how a hypocritical douchebag like yourself will judge this comment. On the one hand it's informative, but on the other, it's kind of attacky.
Posted On: Monday, Apr. 27 2009 @ 9:11PMIt's unfathomable to me that young people would be in favor of such a retrograde idea as a convention center hotel. That's how we tried to grow cities in the 1980s and it did nothing to spur development. Turns out you revitalize downtowns by building cool and affordable housing, expanding your parks, offering incentives to small businesses and eschewing big box development.
Posted On: Monday, Apr. 27 2009 @ 9:20PM@Massengil
Nope, that wasn't me but thanks for proving my point. Why do you have to resort to name calling? Is that the best you can do? Douchebag? I guess it's my own fault for reading these comments.
@Really?
I guess it comes down to these young people want to see downtown grow and the hope is that the hotel will help bring people and businesses in. If the hotel isn't the answer then what is? How are we going to make downtown a destination? Expensive condos and high priced restaurants aren't working.
Chris, thanks for your comments. You're right that expensive condos and high prices restaurants aren't working. But smart cities grow in other ways. Like I said, they expand their parks, build their green ways into the city, give tax incentives to grocery stories--like Dallas is already doing. These are the kinds of things that work in other cities. Not convention centers or, for that matter, costly, dangerous toll roads through city parks.
Posted On: Monday, Apr. 27 2009 @ 10:47PM
I just watched channel 8's "Hotel Debate" from Saturday and found the answer to my RIP question. Leppert is attempting to distance himself as "the face" of the issue. He said: "Its not about me, it's about those young people that stood up". He refers to RIP as a group of young professionals who took it upon themselves to study the issue and realized how important it was to their future to have the hotel built.
@lemurskin:
I assume you've come to realize that the best way to think of R.I.P. Dallas is as "Leppert Youth." (thanks, Bob)
R.I.P. is headed by Dupree Scovell, whose dad, John Scovell, is both the head of the Dallas Citizens Council and the Vote No! organization. More relevant, however, is Scovell (John's) role as the head of Woodbine Development, the owner of the Reunion Hyatt, controlling holder of the residual interest in Reunion Center, and holder of a long-term leasehold stake in Union Station.
Many of the other R.I.P. leaders are members of Mayor Leppert's South Dallas Task Force.
The great thing about Leppert Youth/R.I.P. Dallas, is that the Mayor can use it to do things that he can't easily do directly. As an example, R.I.P. Dallas advocates civil disobedience-- they then went and illegally planted campaign signs in highway medians throughout the City; the Mayor was able to close his eyes and pretend he didn't know of/approve of this action (although he has yet to publicly criticize them for this). Similarly , R.I.P. Dallas makes vicious, personal attacks on those who oppose its agenda (calling them losers, idiots, etc., etc.)-- obviously the Mayor needs to maintain his distance from that sort of thing. Meanwhile, he and the Dallas Citizens Council support them through a variety of covert, opaque methods.
I was recently downtown visiting my 20 year-old son, and he said to me, "You know, Dad. What would really make this downtown great was if it had a lot more conventioneers running around because conventioneers are the coolest of the cool and all the new development that will be built to entertain some 45 year-old plumber will clearly appeal to me, too, as a soon-to-be 21 year-old urban dweller."
This is quite a change from when I was in my 20s and seeking out an urban lifestyle (before giving up and moving to the suburbs). I tended to not think conventioneers as being on the cutting edge.
Posted On: Tuesday, Apr. 28 2009 @ 12:47AMWell, it is nice to see tourists wandering all around in that part of town on a sunny Sunday afternoon.
@Wylie H.-
Why is it news to you that rich and powerful people in this City (any city) want to groom their kids to be the next generation of civic leaders? If you look around, you will see that lots of groups around town have little social and networking clubs for their kids. And these clubs also do a lot charity work, like volunteering for the non profit that they support and donating money to their causes, and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.
What you see as a covert operation I see as civic responsibility, and I'm not talking about this particular hotel issue. Whether we agree with the hotel or not, I think we all should agree that it's a good thing when young people get involved in their city, no matter who their parents are. Lord knows that for every young person who gets involved there are at least a hundred more whose only concern in life is partying at the Gohstbar (is that where you kids are partying these day?) and scoring chicks.
Posted On: Tuesday, Apr. 28 2009 @ 1:40AMMy choice of music for this ad would be:
"Leper(t) Messiah" by Metallica from the Master of Puppets album.
BOW TO LEPPERT MESSIAH!
Posted On: Tuesday, Apr. 28 2009 @ 1:50AMAnonymous says:
Zack's a good lil' commie, he'd love it.
=====================================
You got your head up you ass and know nothing about Zach. And he rocks more with the tip of his dick that you can with you whole body. You Right Wing dumb ass
Posted On: Tuesday, Apr. 28 2009 @ 2:00AM@ Chris
"I guess it comes down to these young people want to see downtown grow and the hope is that the hotel will help bring people and businesses in. If the hotel isn't the answer then what is? How are we going to make downtown a destination? Expensive condos and high priced restaurants aren't working."
I'd debate that yes it is working, but then again most of the residential units aren't high-priced condos, but rental units. A bit of economics, the most expensive land will always be downtown, in any city in any country. So naturally it will be more expensive. Some city's use rent controls or other devices to contain market-value rent. But, the plain truth is that now, downtown is more vibrant than when I moved in 3 years ago.
As for the restaurants, I agree, there are too-many high priced eateries and a lower priced points would do well, but that is an urban design issue. We put those things in the tunnels and no hotel will fix that.
As for your claims that the hotel will revitalize downtown because it will bring in conventions, when will it actually work? That claim was used to build the arena (the circular roof near the CC), then build the CC, then expand it, then expand it, then expand it and then remodel it. Everyone of those were done with the promise of revitalizing downtown. When will it work? When will downtown be revitalized.
Now add to that the shinking industry that is conventions and the fact that other cities have spent billions to attract conventions and what does that give us? A waste of money. Chicago built a CCH in 1998. Five years later they had seen less conventions than before. St. Louis has defaulted on theirs as the promise that "users would pay back the bond debt" proved not to be true. New York is still a top destination for conventiions and doesn't have an attached hotel. What does it all mean? That a hotel is not a needed as claimed and would be a frivolous waste of money.
Posted On: Tuesday, Apr. 28 2009 @ 7:46AMSomeone commented that Dallas will get all the benefit for the Superbowl. I don't know about that, Jerry and company really like the Gaylord Texan.
The Texan is the Convention Center and the Hotel. This is far more convenient than anything in Dallas.
If developing Downtown is your goal and THAT will bring conventions downtown then you should support a trolley network centered on Downtown.
This would create the buzz, expand the commercial real estate accessibility that is needed to make downtown pop. This is what will bring tourism, tourist don't bring the city folk. If that were so, then the West End would have led the city's revitalization. Instead, it became a destination for tourists, virgin teens and a few panhandlers.
Posted On: Tuesday, Apr. 28 2009 @ 8:04AM@ cp
You should be troubled that the idea of "grooming" one's children for a life of civic leadership was the term and concept used by the aristocracy of Europe. You trained your children to understand and give lip service to the poor ("charity work"), while profiting off them in a life that was completely disconnected from their plight.
I'm not one for conspiracies, but it's a fact that inter-generational transfer of wealth is a roadblock to true capitalism, where the hardest working people with the best ideas prosper. It removes the incentive to work and create value in society. Instead, time and money are spent protecting the status quo and existing vested interests.
Posted On: Tuesday, Apr. 28 2009 @ 9:37AMOh please, Dallas has always been a charitable city. And no, I disagree that grooming one's children to take civic responsibility is a bad thing. You say "charity work" as if it's a dirty word. I work in the non profit sector and your comments that they are giving lip service to the poor while profiting off the poor's back is an extreme viewpoint. You're right, maybe the aristocracy in Europe in the 17th century, but not in Dallas, Texas in 2009.
Posted On: Tuesday, Apr. 28 2009 @ 9:47AMMany Dallas natives are just a few generations removed from East Texas so you can hardly compare them to any aristocracy. Maybe a few lived the "Tara" lifestyle way back when.
I don't know the Scovells well but they actually attended DISD schools (gasp!) and take pride and interest in their city.
I don't agree with them on this (I think we should use such funds for streetcars and Fair Park) but I don't begrudge them their position nor any monetary interest they may have. I feel the same about the family of my personal real estate hero, Trammell Crow.
The Gaylord Texan is just an souped-up Embassy Suites. Why not give visitors something real by holding conventions and building a hotel at Fair Park? With a streetcar coming down Haskell, connecting to DART Fair Park and the Santa Fe Trail over a day-lighted Mill Creek? This is the way I would spend money...
Posted On: Tuesday, Apr. 28 2009 @ 1:46PMWe really should all get together and discuss this rationally at the Windmill or the Landing ;)
Posted On: Tuesday, Apr. 28 2009 @ 4:09PMYea, I was being a little dramatic about the whole question of aristocracy. Dallas is not old enough to have it like Europe, or even New York, for that matter. But I stand by my comment about family wealth. Maybe the difference is that many families in Dallas are still working hard to accumulate more, so they are passing the traits of work to their children. At some point, it becomes about maintenance, and the people spending the money are so far removed from the people who worked to make it that they get defensive. And I don't think that they are guided by malice, but their viewpoint on what is good for Dallas often happens to coincide with what is good for their own pockets.
As far as making charity a dirty word? It doesn't have to be, but mostly I see the charity circuit as a social vehicle. The parties generate money for worthy causes, but let's be honest - it's mostly about the party.
Posted On: Tuesday, Apr. 28 2009 @ 4:24PMNobody does anything for free. Not even poor poeple or middle-class poeple. Yeah wealthy poeple (as well as many middle class folks, I might add) give to charity because of tax reasons. You act as if people in this country don't have a right to attain wealth and be as obnoxious about it as they like. You and I might think some poeple are greedy and that's possible when we talk about people who have a home in the Hamptons, a villa on the French Riviera, a private condo in the Caymans and a ski lodge in the Swiss Alps. And use a fleet of private jets to get to and fro them all. Sure, that's motivated by pure greed. That's not the case right here and now.
Geez, have you ever even been invited to a "charity event", more commonly termed a non-profit fundraiser? As someone who spends a good 70% of my time trying to come up with good reasons to get people to the "party", you're totally wrong-there are around 1.5 million non-profit organizations in the country, and most are very small (with budgets under $25k a year). We're a little bigger than that but still considered small, and I'm proud of how well we leverage our dollars. In fact, I'm having a little fundraiser on Thursday, do you need to be invited, so you can socialize with all the cool kids? I like to think that people will come to my "party" because we tell a damn good story that's fun and interesting. This isn't the Cattle Baron's Ball.
LakeWWWooder has a good point, that the Scovells went to DISD schools. They don't live in HP, and didn't send their kids to private schools. This beating them up because they're rich and connected is getting tiresome and I just hate to see poeple that are well-intentioned continue to get bashed and their motivations questioned by poeple who happen to disagree with them on this ONE single stinkin issue. This whole debate has turned into a class thing because of the RIP group. Now it's about sons and daughters of rich people are evil and clueless. It's getting real old real fast and May 9 can't get here fast enough.
Posted On: Tuesday, Apr. 28 2009 @ 9:05PMI have been to a few events where it was mostly about the party but then again I usually go to the 'second tier' more pedestrian events like Habitat where people actually care and nobody minds who is the 'star' of the event.
At our Woodrow 80th event benefiting the International Baccalaureat Diploma Programme last weekend Trammel S. Crow attended to represent his late father. We were glad to see him and appreciative but we really didn't give him any special treatment. I think he liked that...
Posted On: Wednesday, Apr. 29 2009 @ 11:33AM














