Dallas Fed Head Says of "Buy American" Clause, It's "The Crack Cocaine of Economics"
| Dallas Federal Reserve president and CEO Richard Fisher |
| Dallas Federal Reserve president and CEO Richard Fisher |
12 comment(s) / Post a Comment
Damn!!! Come on BABAY!! You know I need some of that "crack cocaine of economics"!!
Posted On: Monday, Feb. 2 2009 @ 10:52AMFree trade is a terrific policy, but it is effective ONLY when practiced on an even playing field, and therein lies the problem.
Posted On: Monday, Feb. 2 2009 @ 10:55AMFree trade is a terrific policy.
And is most effective for those who practice it most extensively.
Posted On: Monday, Feb. 2 2009 @ 11:00AMThis is exactly what triggered the Great Depression. The Smoot-Hawley tariff act is considered by pretty much anybody who's done even the lightest reading on the subject to be at the core of what triggered the whole thing.
It was protectionist barriers that the US set in place that caused a worldwide backlash of tariffs and trade restrictions that ground world trade to a halt and destroyed businesses around the globe.
Even a letter signed by over 1,000 of the nation's leading economists of the time couldn't convince Hoover to veto the act. That's why he's famous for Hoovervilles. Make your reservations now. It appears that there may be a tarpaper shack in all of our futures.
Gee, I hope mine has Dish Network...
Posted On: Monday, Feb. 2 2009 @ 11:57AMLakewooder, I agree. Few issues are worth supporting or opposing, in my mind it is far more important HOW they are executed.
A free-trade agreement could for instance assert that all Chinese exports be powered by fairly modern energy production and that these jobs be 115%-125% of the Chinese average.
Of course there is little support for real labor issues in this country. Michael Hudson, who was a Wall St. trader and Kucinich's econ. adviser has an interesting paradigm. He talks of the FIRE sector Finance, Insurance and Real Estate.
The FIRE sector is a classic drain on the economy, charging rent for their assets. He asserts we should rather encourage Labor and Industry. Our economic policies have shifted the tax burden to labor and industry while encouraging FIRE.
This has resulted in property taxes being too low. If property taxes were lower, if borrowing weren't encouraged home values would drop. This would be good as buyers would have to bite off less debt to buy houses.
Many of us have cheered this hollowing out of America. Sadly, Obama doesn't seem to be signaling much change.
Posted On: Monday, Feb. 2 2009 @ 12:00PMheh it seems like every single economic concept has the ability to spiral out of control.
Posted On: Monday, Feb. 2 2009 @ 12:11PMYou are right Chad. The problem is some people know how to manipulate any economic concept to their advantage while screwing the rest of us. But I do think the concept of giving the common man just enough to survive with and not complain is over.
Posted On: Monday, Feb. 2 2009 @ 12:20PMFisher is always entertaining and has a real way with words, although the crack cocaine metaphor does not really fit.
"Protectionism is the ___ of economics."
I think it has to be something that is good for you when you are the first and only one doing it, but bad when everyone else winds up doing it too. Or maybe I'm missing his point.
Posted On: Monday, Feb. 2 2009 @ 1:58PMIt's not necessarily good for the U.S. even if the U.S. were the only ones doing it as it usually means higher prices for U.S. consumers (including other domestic businesses) and a deadweight loss to the economy as a whole.
Posted On: Monday, Feb. 2 2009 @ 3:35PMFisher was on Fox Business today at 1:30 pm:
Posted On: Monday, Feb. 2 2009 @ 3:35PMI find it insulting that the People are accused of being seduced by "crack cocaine". Who are these wealthy ruling-class swindlers to tell us what is in our self interest? We have listened to these privileged spend-all-day-golfing good-old-boys long enough to know that we've been fooled by their free trade propaganda. And another thing, what exactly justifies the continued economic privilege of the Wall Street ruling class? At this point you can't say they've earned it. Why do hard working people like my father have to face the prospect of working until the day they die because their retirement savings disappeared while these wealthy thieves make off with the fortunes they've socked away over the last decade? They need to be locked up with their assets sold. Ask yourselves this: Are we citizens or subjects?
Posted On: Tuesday, Feb. 3 2009 @ 1:19AMWe are subjects, of course. We haven't been citizens since they started listening in on your phone conversations, opening our mail and e-mail, viewing our reading lists, etc., without court order. Even now, with a new administration alleging that they'll be more responsible with our civil liberties, they still think we ought to "move on" instead of prosecuting the people who turned us into subjects over the last eight years.
I understand your frustration over what Wall Street's done to us, how they've transfered our wealth and made it theirs. But like George C. Scott said in the Flim Flam Man: "You can't cheat an honest man."
And not to say that your father was intentionally dishonest, but we were all seduced by the easy money aspect of investing right alongside of the Big Boys, bellying up to the same bar, as it were, via stocks and mutual funds. And that was always Mordecai's contention (George C.'s character), that his whole game wouldn't play without people willing to spin the wheel and take the risk, even when they suspected that the game was rigged. It's like Las Vegas. Millions go every year to dump their money at the feet of Organized Crime, knowing full well that their chances of going home a winner are somewhere between slim and none. But still they go.
And on Wall Street, no matter how many fineprint disclaimers they put on prospectus', folks are still willing to Roll Them Bones.
Now, our collective fingers are burnt and we're mad as Hell. But, short of dusting off the guilotine and dragging them out into the streets for their comeuppance, there's nothing we can do about it. Because the very people who we are expecting to regulate and punish these guys, these guys who have made off with your father's savings, were bought and paid for by the folks we want them to bring down.
It ain't gonna happen. It's going to be business as usual. The rich get richer, the poor get poorer.
We are subjects.






