The Dallas Observer Blog



Add to Technorati Favorites

Blogroll

The Concession Stand

The Midway

On the Border, Off the Fence

Fri May 16, 2008 at 11:58:42 AM

Days after Farmers Branch voters handed Tim O’Hare a mandate to enforce immigration laws -- or at least try -- and Carrollton voters replaced Don Henley's fiancée with O'Hare of the dog that bit you, folks and leaders along Texas’ southern border seem to feel a bit differently. They're more like, oh, Tommy Lee Jones.

El Paso’s county commissioners voted 3-1 on Monday in favor of a resolution that calls for halting construction of the border wall; they also insisted that local law enforcement officials should not enforce federal immigration laws. Then there’s the mayor of Brownsville, who dispensed with niceties and flat out called Rep. Tom Tancredo a bigot and lambasted the wall project as “racist.” And the Texas Border Coalition -- a consortium of South Texas municipal, academic and resident groups -- will announce at a Washington, D.C., press conference today that it’s suing the Department of Homeland Security over the planned border wall. Perhaps they should get a certain St. Mark's grad to author their complaint. --Megan Feldman

Update: The suit was indeed filed today, and among among the allegations, reports the Associated Press: "Landowners' rights to equal protection under the law were violated because the fence bypasses the property of some well-connected landowners, including Dallas billionaire Ray Hunt and his relatives." Which Friends of Unfair Park have known since February.

5 Comments:

religion of bacon says:

lambasted the wall project as “racist"

So they're building a wall that selectively keeps out Hispanics, including legal immigrants and visitors, while allowing non-Hispanics, including illegals, to pass through freely? That would be an impressive feat of racist engineering.

Christopher says:

lambast (v.) lit. to beat, to lame, to strip off or remove the skin from by thrashing.

I found "lambasting" an amusing action for a group to take, if it is trying to present something else as being racist given the historical undertones of slavery. It'd be like if I said, "violent people make me so upset, I just wanna kill them". Interesting, anyway...

I think if the project should be labeled anything, it should be labeled "countryist". A fence is a natural segregator, in fact it is its essense. In this instance, however, it is separating countries not races, so hence it is "countryist".

cactusflinthead says:

"Landowners' rights to equal protection under the law were violated because the fence bypasses the property of some well-connected landowners, including Dallas billionaire Ray Hunt and his relatives."

What part of that did you misunderstand?
Ray Hunt ain't having that damn fence built on his property. It stops at his door. This is a stupid idea. A massively idiotic idea that will cost billions and not work.
Equal protection just might shit-can this lame ass attempt.

Christopher says:

Eminent domain will pretty much nullify equal protection rights, I'm sure. The gov't merely needs to substantiate a greater public benefit (including economic benefit and nat'l security) by adding a fence [here] than not. That said, I really don't understand the point of a non-concurrent fence. Is the point to stop crossing traffic hot-spots, dangerous crossing places, whilly-nilly, what? AND...if you're Ray Hunt and Sharyland Business Park happens to be the only unfenced/low-fenced border stretch for a great while (thanks to $$$ and friends), aren't you worried about immigration bottle-necking over and into your investment?

Randy says:

I read an earlier story about this fencing issue and it said that illegals found trespassing on Hunt's golf course are arrested immediately by private security guards. Sounds like he already does a better job of border enforcement than our federal government or local law enforcement.

By the way, there has been a federal border easement law on the books since the 1800's. If memory serves me, the first 80 feet of land along our national border belongs to the federal government for the purpose of securing the border with fences, walls, and/or roads to patrol the border.

Post a comment

Comments may not show up immediately after submission. Please wait a minute after posting a comment for it to appear.



Dallas Observer Insiders

  • Local food, music and news blasts
  • Free Stuff