The Dallas Observer Blog



Add to Technorati Favorites

Blogroll

The Concession Stand

The Midway

When It Comes to Downtown Rail, Tomorrow Looks Like Yesterday

Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 11:39:19 AM
From the Collections of the Texas/Dallas History and Archives Division, Dallas Public Library
Pacific Avenue, circa 1920

In last week's paper version of Unfair Park, I wrote about the mess we’re going to have next year when Dallas Area Rapid Transit spills a whole new rail line of traffic down Pacific Avenue in downtown Dallas.

According to a contract signed with the city 18 years ago, DART should have begun building a second reliever route five years ago, preferably in a subway, for trains going through downtown. But because the city got slicked by the suburbs, the way it does in all so-called regional governance, DART spent its money instead building trains out to the boondocks, where nobody needs mass transit anyway.

So next year train traffic on the DART tracks down Pacific will go through the roof, significantly exceeding safe peak levels. And car and bus traffic downtown will be screwed for however many years it takes to build a subway (unless we adopt the Schutze Solution, described after the jump). In the meantime, after my article ran I received an intriguing phone call from preservation expert, author and activist Virginia McAlester, who told me about the great “Spike-Pulling Ceremony” that took place at the corner of Pacific, Live Oak and St. Paul in 1921.

You know that image of the golden spike ceremony on May 10, 1869, at Promontory Summit in the Utah Territory? Think: the opposite of that.

Virginia’s grandfather, William R. Harris -- a lawyer, co-founder of Thompson & Knight and the man who successfully prosecuted Pa Ferguson at his impeachment trial -- helped negotiate the deal that got the Texas and Pacific Railway tracks removed from Pacific Avenue.

Getting rail traffic removed from Pacific was one of the few concrete products of the Kessler Plan, Dallas’s first comprehensive city-wide plan devised by George E. Kessler. Long freight trains rumbling down Pacific were a threat to the lives and health of citizens, Kessler told civic leaders in 1911. Rail lines “at grade” -- where cars must wait in order to cross the tracks -- were also cutting off growth of the downtown, he said.

Most of the Kessler plan was ditched by a civic leadership in Dallas that wasn’t interested in parks and broad boulevards. But getting the trains off Pacific was one battle they were willing to take on.

It took 10 years. Virginia’s grandfather was a lead negotiator with the railroads. When an agreement was finally struck, civic leaders held a grand spike-pulling ceremony and parade. One account said, “The gala included a parade featuring a mockup railroad locomotive, bands, fireworks, speeches and motion pictures.”

Can you imagine what any of those folks would think if we brought them back today? We would show them how the current Dallas leadership has allowed downtown to be cut in half again by a new railroad, exactly where they pulled that spike nearly 90 years ago. What would they think?

O.K., the Schutze Solution -- you saw it here first, Friends. Step One: Ditch entire city council except Angela Hunt and maybe Carolyn Davis and Vonciel Hill, in order to rid council of useless patsies, fools and vagabonds. Step Two: New city council hires some big law firm, maybe Thompson & Knight, to sue DART to keep all rail traffic off Pacific that would tend to exceed the cap stipulated in the 1990 interlocal agreement.

You want to put more traffic through downtown? Great. Build that subway. Otherwise, put your new traffic in some other dark place, which we would also be willing to advise you on.

Just a thought. --Jim Schutze

Category: Schutze

17 Comments:

Spamboy says:

Another solution: head way up north to the suburbs, don't have a reason to ever head into Dallas, forget it exists.

p-rude says:

This is ridiculous. As far back as I can remember we [Dallas] have been losing almost everything to the generic, tit-feeding, white flight cities: Sports teams, an airport, citizens, stadiums, corporate offices and then some. Why can't Dallas ever be the "big dog" in the hunt?
It seems to me that if downtown Dallas traffic (the hub in our transit wheel) becomes congested then no one will benefit. Unless the few residents we have downtown get fed up and move to Frisco...
Hmmm, pretty sneaky sis.

Chris says:

I didn't realize that Jim hates the suburbs so much...

JimS says:

I do not hate the suburbs. I simply do not understand them.

Peterk says:

the circa date for the photo is incorrect. It is more likely c.1925 because you can barely see the Dallas Athletic Club building on the left, and on the right you is the Medical Arts Building which was constructed in 1923

Anonymous says:

What's to understand. They're houses that people live in, but they're in a different place than the houses within the city limits of Dallas.

Honestly, I live in Plano, but I'm less than a mile from the Dallas city limits. If not for the sign telling me I've crossed over from Plano to Dallas, I wouldn't be able to tell the difference.

Or is that part of Dallas still the suburbs?

Lakewooder says:

All this fuss about rail and congestion in downtown Dallas is much ado about nothing. City Hall's got their eyes on the prize - a shiny new convention center hotel. It'll fix everything.

cp says:

DART follows a ROW within mere feet from the interurban line that ran from DTD north to Sherman, back in the 20's.

DART is following a ROW with mere feet at the entrance to the State Fair.

We have come to realize our mistakes of yesterday, of a time when RL Thornton tooted his famous line about Dallas never becoming a modern city as long as it's tied to an antiquated electric rail transit system. He must have been getting paid off by Goodyear and Ford.

There is a huge difference between freight rail and light rail. Huge. HUGE! You simply cannot compare freight rail traffic in the early part of the last century to light rail transit today. Lots of cities share their streets with their light rail transit. No cities share their downtown streets with freight rail.

I don't want to know why Jim seems so hostile to the suburbs, I want to know why he seems so hostile to light rail transit. He's mad that DART spent money (that it got from the suburbs) on mass transit from the suburban boondocks where he claims don't need mass transit. If that were true, then our trains would be empty every day and we wouldn't be talking about peak capacity and needing to build more lines. DART is the mass transportation expert in our region, not the city council, not Virginia McAllister and not Jim Schutze. Had DART been wrong about where it should put light rail for transporting people quickly from suburbs to DTD, then we wouldn't even be having this conversation. We will be at peak usage precisely because we need mass transit.

Exactly how long does it take for normal traffic lights to cycle? More than a minute? Certainly less than two minutes. Traffic in DTD is not bad. Traffic on 635 is. The fastest way for me to get from McKinney Avenue to Fair Park (near my home) is through downtown. I will be glad when the Green line opens, because I hate driving. It takes less than 10 minutes to get to Industrial Blvd. from Deep Ellum. All this is during rush hour. It's not really congested. Maybe I just know how to get around DTD batter than some, but I have never thought DTD has a traffic congestion problem. We don;t have enough density in DTD for auto traffic to be a problem. When we get to the magic number fr so-called critical mass in DTD- 20,000 residents- then it might be a problem. But at that point, it's likely that a lot of those people won't be driving because they'll be taking the LRT and walking a couple blocks to get around in DTD.

Dallas might do better to shut down Elm and Commerce in DTD to all auto traffic and run a few streetcars in a continual loop.

Original Lakewooder says:

You should listen to cp - she's pretty smart and makes a mean margarita.

I could see a subway serving Commerce or at-grade along Young (already divided by a parkway). However another issue is that DART appears to be abandoning its commitment to Union Station. How about some more of your great investigative gumption directed there?

You know we could connect Hyatt, Reunion, Union Station and the Convention Center for much less than $40 million for a parking lot.

James S says:

I'll never understand why the original downtown line wasn't elevated to begin with. No additional line would be necessary downtown. I can never think of a train system seriously when it has to stop at stoplights with street traffic. Real cities don't work that way.

Wylie H. says:

If you want to understand why Dallas always gets "slicked" by the suburbs and Ft. Worth (DART, Cowboy Stadium, Rangers, Wright Amendement, Trinity Highway, etc.) just look at the source of political contributions of most Dallas City Council members and our Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson. A major source of their funding (the majority in the case of EBJ) appears to come from non-residents and those backed by suburban interests (this includes the Dallas Citizens Council--- which would be more appropriately be named the North Texas Citizens Council).

Imagine what Arlington would like lack if all its councilmembers turned to Dallas residents for political contributions.

The outcome, whether intentional or unintentional, is that non-residents tend to be very, very large powerbrokers in the City of Dallas.

In essence, Dallas is kind of like the underpaid "whore" of North Texas-- well-funded suburban interests pop in from time to time to have their "way" with us, and we surrender our soul and tax base to the rest of North Texas, one dirty deed at a time. Think of Mayor Leppert and the City Council as our pimps, facilitating the transaction.

Bill M. says:

cp --
"No cities share their downtown streets with freight rail."
Uh-uh. Not even close. A number of cities share downtown streets with rail freight traffic, among them Oakland, California.
By the way, for a picture of the bad old days when Texas & Pacific ran up Pacific Avenue, check out http://photoswest.org:8080/cgi-bin/cw_cgi?fullRecord+1731+594+98+8+-1

Gabe says:

cp,

I agree on at least one point: I've never been on a Dart Train (even at 2:00pm or 11:00pm - which seem to be slow times) that wasn't at least half full. That includes going from Dallas to Plano, Garland to Dallas, Richardson to Oakcliff. The vast majority of the time it seems to be 80% full, even in the suburbs.

So Jim, saying the burbs don't need mass transit seems like a very silly statement. Are you basing this comment on DART ridership data or on anecdotal information. If the latter, I'd like to know how you came to your conclusion: how many times have you ridden DART out to or back from the subways?

I suspect your comment was based on neither data or your own experience, but on sheer distaste for suburban living.

And really, what pays for DART? Is it property taxes? Cause I always thought that it was a 1% sales tax. Which means that it's those RICH, SUBURBAN people (in SUVs) at the mall, who don't use DART at all, who are paying for it.

Man I wish I was rich and suburban.

Peterk says:

go here and type in Dallas
http://history.denverlibrary.org/images/index.html

and you'll see plenty of streetcar scenes

Branden Helms says:

Jim, your facts are wrong. In the pact the city signed, it states that a second line must be built when trains reach intervals of 2.5 minutes in one direction. The current Red and Blue average 5 minutes. The addition of the Green Line in 2010 will push it to 3.3 minutes. The Orange Line, when completed in 2013, will reach the mythical limit of 2.5 minutes.

But as I stated, the city is a little ignorant when it comes to railed transit. In downtown, at major street intersections, the lights cycle at 1-1.5 minute intervals or at least one minute less the "peak" rail intervals. If the lights in the transit mall were timed to stop traffic only when a train is coming and is clear the rest of the time, there would actually be less congstion than is currently.

Jim, I am curious, how often have you rode the train? How often have you observed the train in downtown?

For those interested, I compiled a map of old historic streetcar lines in Dallas. While it is still a work in progress, and not 100% complete, I would venture to guess that it is over 95% accurate.

http://www.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&hl=en&msa=0&msid=111053706958580298750.0004477da882a2f7e7baa&z=12

Branden Helms says:

Jim, I also though of something else.

You say "Can you imagine what any of those folks would think if we brought them back today? We would show them how the current Dallas leadership has allowed downtown to be cut in half again by a new railroad, exactly where they pulled that spike nearly 90 years ago. What would they think?"

I would also like to point out that these same leaders from yesteryear helped destroy a vast streetcar and interurban system, allowed downtown to degrade to the point where it is no longer a public gathering space for the city and built freeways that cut through and vanquished viable neighborhoods, while building them to farmland that would eventually fuel the rise of the suburbs you so despise.

Mike says:

Talking about back to the future, it looks like several Oak Cliff businesses and residents are actively attempting to revive their original streetcar system:

www.oakcliffta.org

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)



Dallas Observer Insiders

  • Local food, music and news blasts
  • Free Stuff