The Dallas Observer Blog



Add to Technorati Favorites

Blogroll

The Concession Stand

The Midway

Notes from "The Crime Scene": 2505 Turtle Creek Boulevard Is Gone.

Sun Apr 20, 2008 at 12:00:03 PM
Daron Tapscott
At 8 a.m., demolition crews began tearing down 2505 Turtle Creek Boulevard.

The neighbors knew something was up yesterday: Workers were in and out of the building, removing whatever they could salvage. But no way did they ever imagine that come 8 a.m. today that 2505 Turtle Creek Boulevard would be only an address -- a patch of land atop which now sits a pile of twisted metal and busted bricks that used to be an office building designed by the late Harwood K. Smith. "It's a crime scene," said one devastated neighbor this morning, surveying the wreckage cordoned off by yellow "Caution" tape. "The neighbors are really upset," says Daron Tapscott, chair of the Landmark Commission's Designation Committee.

Earlier this month, the City Plan Commission voted to deny Canadian developer GGH Development's request to build on that spot a 21-story luxury hotel, complete with residential suites, a spa and a restaurant; the developer will plead its case to the city council on WednesdayMay 14. And no longer will the council be able to scrap a proposed hotel in favor of preserving a historic Dallas office building, whose architect became the namesake for the architecture and engineering firm responsible for such mammoth, megamillions venues as the American Airlines Center and the new Dallas Cowboys stadium in Arlington. Because on the very morning the building was cited in The Dallas Morning News as one "of the best examples of midcentury-modern architecture in the Dallas area," Smith's building is no more.

Daron Tapscott
More from "the crime scene" this morning

Tapscott tells Unfair Park the permit for demolition was issued in the first week of April -- the day after the CPC denied the rezoning application, citing, among its reasons, the HKS connection. "They can still build on the site," Tapscott says, "but they still have the dry overlay," meaning they can't sell alcohol in the proposed hotel's restaurant or bar. "And it's still a residential neighborhood."

Council member Angela Hunt couldn't be reached for comment, nor could the developers. Alas, there will be plenty more tomorrow -- including some 30 photos we took on site just after demolition crews fled the scene around 10:30 a.m., after they heard that no one had drained the air conditioning unit of Freon. And we'll continue trying to reach Karl Crawley, who's repping the developers on behalf of Dallas-based Masterplan Consultants, who last week didn't give Unfair Park any indication that GGH would be tearing down the building before its council appeal on Wednesday.

The building was fair game because the Landmark Commission hadn't yet begun designation proceedings that would have protected 2505 Turtle Creek Boulevard, even temporarily. Tapscott says it had been discussed, but no one had begun the process of designating it as a Dallas historic landmark. And now, it's too late: A developer did the deciding for the city, and now one more piece of history is history. --Robert Wilonsky

15 Comments:

Wylie H. says:

"demolition crews fled the scene around 10:30 a.m., after they heard that no one had drained the air conditioning unit of Freon."

What about asbestos abatement? Was there any, and if so, when was that done?

Dallas is plastic and concrete says:

Excellent piece,

I am sick at my stomach.....

Why can't our city government stop this kind of thing??????????????????

houston says:

how did it happen. check for an plain, unmarked, sealed envelope being passed between
permits-contractors-city council

Peterk says:

Gee how reminiscent of the middle of the night destruction of the Kresge Building

as for asbestos abatement don't worry about it. turns out asbestos abatement causes more problems than one would think. If there was any asbestos present it would have been dispersed by the wind.

I didn't vote against it for preservation issues.

As one of the people that voted against the plan, I can say that I voted against it because I thought various aspects of the plan needed work e.g. the traffic plan and having liquor near the park. We can only vote on land use.


However, this was a great example of mid-century no matter whom was the architect. Still, I wish something could have been done.


Mark Allen says:

Great photograph.

Don Abbott says:

Wow, developers win again in Dallas. That's news? If ever there was a place where the old axiom what's old is worthless was part and parcel of every decision, this is THE place. Old Red and the Cotton Bowl could so easily be condos. What are we waiting for?

Rhinosaur says:

An ugly building has been torn down...how will we go on?

brett says:

maybe I'm ignorant, but what does having a park next to a hotel/restaurant/bar have anything to do with anything? Most of the time, people are drinking at night, and last time I checked, most parks are empty at night.

I'm not condoning drinking and driving, but I'm also not going to play coy at say it doesn't happen. I just don't understand why people are so uptight about the whole deal. Someone please enlighten me.

Pete says:

I'm trying but have been unsuccessful in finding where this item is on Wednesday's City Council agenda or addendum. I saw only four zoning cases on the agenda and three involved District 5 and the other District 13.

Pete, it was originally scheduled to go before the council on Wednesday but has since been pushed to May 14.

Next door neighbor says:

I have a few things to say about this piece:

1) This building was an eye sore, and a view that almost deterred me from buying the condo in which I live. I am not an expert in architecture, but if this is a fine example of mid-century modern then we need to forget about this period and move on. It was a box with a car port.

2) If this were such a fine example of architecture, why didn't anyone take pictures of it while it was in tact.

3) With regards to the proposed variance, it was written with specific provisions to prevent any misuse of the property. "Having alcohol near a park" - They would not be selling bottles of Jack Daniels in paper bags so that people can hang out in Reverchon Park and get wasted. Also, only a building with that exact floor plan could be built. I hope that for the sake of the neighborhood, the city council overturns it. In the least, my view out of my window is not nearly as sullied as it was two days ago.

Cheers

Chris McKinley says:

brett, you need to check again. parks are most certainly NOT empty at night, especially reverschon, flag pole hill or anything with nature trails. you should check it out.

brett says:

Chris,

thanks for the info. I agree with Neighbor, though. We're talking about Turtle Creek here...not Deep Ellum. People aren't going to be walking around drinking out of bags (and that doesn't happen much here in Deep Ellum either).

Post a comment

Comments may not show up immediately after submission. Please wait a minute after posting a comment for it to appear.



Dallas Observer Insiders

  • Local food, music and news blasts
  • Free Stuff