Unfair Park




Add to Technorati Favorites

Blogroll

The Concession Stand

The Midway

Craig Watkins "Doesn't Care About Good Press," Gets More

Wed Apr 23, 2008 at 02:02:16 PM

No, Evan Smith, "exonerated" is not "too strong a word" when describing what happened last week to Thomas McGowan, the 16th Dallas County prisoner freed after DNA testing revealed he wasn't guilty of the crime for which he'd been convicted and sentenced to prison for 23 years. Smith, the editor of Texas Monthly, interviewed Dallas County District Attorney Craig Watkins yesterday for a phone-call podcast, during which Watkins says the county's actually conducted 40 DNA tests, 16 of which resulted in exonerations.

Smith asks Watkins why the county didn't DNA test before his election. Simple, says Watkins: "This is a political position, and the political climate wanted that whole tough-on-crime approach, ands, fortunately, we have seen the political failures of that and gotten past that. ... It's politics. [And] the majority of the commissioners in Dallas County are Republicans." Then it gets really interesting. Worth a download. --Robert Wilonsky

5 Comments:

ignoreLander says:

I let my subscription to TM lapse earlier this year, when the "Best Steaks in Texas" issue came out. In it, Smith editorializes about how he is a staunch vegetarian, and how the photo of steak on the cover "grosses him out". This is the editor of Texas Freaking Monthly. What a douchebag.

Randy says:

A few questions regarding Craig Watkins and DNA exoneration:

1) Is Craig Watkins spending 1/10th as much time putting criminals behind bars as he is investigating past convictions?

2) If DNA evidence can prove that a person is not guilty, can it also prove that a person is guilty? If that's the case, can we just skip the trial by jury and scientifically convict or exonerate the accused when DNA evidence is available?

3) Isn't it possible that a person could be an accomplice to a violent crime without leaving behind DNA evidence?

dis-belief says:

He talks of how bad Henry Wade's prosecutors were.....then why did he promote one of them to supervisor who was responsible for convicting several of the ones who we know now are innocent???????

HWW says:

Watkins is full of it. He makes the accusation that prosecutors under Henry Wade "purposefully went after INNOCENT people." That is a dangerous accusation. Since he has made it then he needs to prosecute those ex prosecutors. That is a crime to purposefully prosecute innocent people. Those are Watkins words so he needs to indict those people.

If he is just puffing up for politics then he should shut up and not make such accusations.

The total of exonerations was 13 under previous adminstrations not 12 as watkins claimed.

Watkins promoted two prosecutors to top supervisors who were Wade's guys and involved in wrongfull convictions cases from the past.

Watkins says he doesn't care about the press and anyone that follows him in the press knows that it a lie. He can't stand anyone trying to criticize him and always responds with editorial pieces to defend any position.

Watkins now says he has a problem with the death penalty. Why the hell does he keep going for it? If he had any guts he should take a stand. He won't say the death penalty is wrong because he's not sure how it migtht hurt him politically. What a hypocrite


Dale says:

In the interview Mr Watkins does say that these innocent people were prosecuted on purpose knowing they were innocent. Since he says it I am sure he believes it. He should announce an investigation and prosecute these ex prosecutors. Put them in prison.

Of course if the truth is that these convictions were becuase of faulty eye witness testimony then Mr. Watkins should cease making these false claims against former prosecutors and try to gain poiltical clout elswhere

Post a comment

Comments may not show up immediately after submission. Please wait a minute after posting a comment for it to appear.



Dallas Observer Insiders

  • Local food, music and news blasts
  • Free Stuff