SXSW

Chasing Amy Winehouse

Sat Mar 17, 2007 at 08:51:14 PM

Last year, it was Lady Sovereign. This year, it was supposed to be Lily Allen. But boozy blues chanteuse Amy Winehouse was the name that emerged as the next hot U.K. diva-to-be at SxSW. We're happy to say we saw her a few times. We're sorry to say that none of those times was on stage.

Prior to the music kickoff at SxSW, rumors circulated that Winehouse had canceled her performances. We knew that wasn't true on Wednesday night, because we saw Winehouse in the lobby of the hotel where she's staying. It was 10:30 p.m., and we were outside the hotel doors, smoking and bemoaning Austin's ban on puffing inside public places when a white van pulled up.

Out climbs Winehouse, along with a huge black guy who we presumed to be her bodyguard. She was all smiles and waves with us, looking happy and sober. The next time we saw her, she looked a little pissed and ripped.

We missed Winehouse's performance at Eternal on Thursday night because the line to get into the venue stretched across 6th Street and down the sidewalk. We missed Winehouse's performance at La Zona Rosa on Friday night because we couldn't haul ass fast enough from another venue to get there before her set ended.

But at around 2:30 a.m. on Friday night/Saturday morning, we were standing outside the hotel smoking again when Winehouse came staggering up by herself. She wasn't smiling this time.

Her big black bouffant hairdo was a little disheveled, and her black Elvira eyeliner was starting to run down her face. We wanted to stop her and ask her what it felt like to be "the next big thing," but she looked really tired and somewhat pissed. Besides, we figured we'd have a chance to talk to her and see her perform on Saturday afternoon -- she was supposed to play at the private NY2London Party that Le Tigre was hosting at Habana Calle. We'd RSVP'd for the party two weeks before SxSW, figuring that even if we missed Winehouse's scheduled performances, we'd have this last chance to see her sing.

Well, Winehouse canceled. No one knows why. Most people speculated that she was drunk, hungover, or hungover and drunk.

On Saturday night, we ran into Winehouse again, this time at a tent show off 6th street and Red River. She wasn't performing; she was just hanging out, with another woman leading her around by the hand. So we took the opportunity to finally approach her.

"Hi, Amy. Can I get a picture with you, please? I've been trying to see you perform all week, and I haven't been able to."

Winehouse's response was a dirty look and silence. She kept walking as if we weren't even there. So we left, secure in the knowledge that Winehouse already has the whole bitch/diva attitude down (at least on this night; maybe she's nicer when she's not being touted as
"The Shit" at a massive music festival).

So we never saw her perform, and have had to rely on feedback from those who did catch one of her shows. Here's some hearsay:

(From a woman who saw her Friday night): "She was really good. She had a great backing band, too, and some backup singers that were doing some cool moves. She's got a great voice."

(From a fellow music critic who saw her twice): "She's not much of a performer. She's got a great voice, but she hides behind the microphone."

Well, so much for catching Winehouse's performances. But there's always the hotel lobby. Maybe we can buy her some drinks and get an a cappella performance in the elevator before she blows town. Provided she's not in "future star" mode again.

Niki Dandrea

Category: SXSW: The Daily Report

Comments (7)

Anonymous:

"huge black dude"?

what does it matter that her bodyguard was a black guy or not?

if it was a white dude would you have said "huge white dude"

doubt it.

gutterkitty:

Yes, they would have said "huge white dude wearing blah-blah-blah" or some other physical descriptor. "Black" is a descriptive adjective, not a symptom of racism, thank you very much.

muffin man fan:

Why do these blog entries not have bylines? I want to know who's writing what, or at least what paper they're from. Or maybe you're just admitting it doesn't matter, because the writing style of VVM staffers is so interchangeable.

Anonymous:

i've found that when someone is white, there is usually not an indicator that they are white, there is just a description: heavy set, brown hair whatever.

There are a lot of white people being described at these shows who are not getting the tag: "white person".

and yes this is racism. if you can't think of anyway to describe a person other than "huge black dude", then you aren't a very talented writer. you're using his race as the primary descriptor--


i suppose the fact that he's black makes him even more ominous , huh?

i'd like to know who's writing this stuff too.


nixon:

i didn't see anything rascist about the description at all, but yeah, usually you don't hear people described as "white," probably because that's the majority and if no other ethnicity or race is indicated, that's what's assumed by everybody

it just struck me as a detail, really, would
"huge mexican guy" or "huge iranian guy" been equally offensive?

Anonymous:

Would "big gay guy" be homophobic? Would "small, slender woman" be sexist? "Old man with a cane" ageist? "Foreign fellow" xenophobic? Would saying "comrades" instead of "friends" be communist? I guess it's all about perception and sensitivity.

I wonder who wrote these too.

Benjamin:

"I guess it's all about perception and sensitivity."

Or oversensitivity in your case...

Post a comment