Beef Products, Inc. Sues ABC News Over Pink Slime Coverage

Categories: Food News

pink slime.jpg
ABC News was slapped with a $1.2 billion defamation lawsuit this morning from Beef Products Inc. as a result of the networks' coverage of the great 2012 Pink Slime Shitstorm earlier this year. Oops, I'm sorry, it was the 2012 Lean Finely Textured Beef Shitstorm.

The coverage, a result of a massive grassroots social media campaign to raise awareness of its existence and heavy use of the processed meat creation by many food suppliers and markets, alerted millions of consumers to the actual composition of the product, many of whom found it repulsive.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the beef company is claiming ABC News led consumers to believe pink slime is some kind of disgusting, unhealthy product! How dare they!

From WSJ:

Dan Webb, a lawyer representing BPI, said ABC defamed its products by simply calling the beef additive "pink slime." Mr. Webb said BPI blames ABC News for causing consumers "to believe that our lean beef product, which is 100% beef, is something called pink slime; that is some type of unhealthy and repulsive liquid product that is not even meat."

Included in the defamation case are claims that ABC News reported pink slime as not being actual beef, but rather a by-product of cow carcasses squished through a Play-Doh machine and sold by "blacklisted" supermarkets.

News outlets around the country are also reporting that the lawsuit specifically targets reporter extraordinaire Diane Sawyer and USDA biologist Gerald Zirnstein, the inventor of the "pink slime" moniker.

BPI shut down several plants and is letting go of hundreds of employees, a decision made after numerous school lunch programs around the country opted to no longer include the product in their offerings.

ABC News Vice President Jeffrey Schneider released a short statement this morning, saying simply, "The lawsuit is without merit. We will contest it vigorously."



Advertisement

My Voice Nation Help
3 comments
colinz
colinz

Haven't we seen this before? Texas Beef Group v. Winfrey comes to mind.

NotAnon
NotAnon

This reminds me of the super cheap Wal-Mart frozen patties labelled as 100% beef(probably all slime).  If the absolute best you can say about your product is that it is, in fact, derived from a real cow there's probably a lot more hiding in the lack of information.  They can sue all they want but I'm guessing the months of exposure from the trial will hurt more in the long run than whatever settlement they can bully out of ABC News. 

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

Loading...